Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17578908›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2007

A functional genomics strategy reveals clockwork orange as a transcriptional regulator in the Drosophila circadian clock.

Akira Matsumoto, Maki Ukai-Tadenuma, Rikuhiro G Yamada, Jerry Houl, Kenichiro D Uno, Takeya Kasukawa, Brigitte Dauwalder, Taichi Q Itoh, Kuniaki Takahashi, Ryu Ueda and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dissecting neuron-specific functions of circadian genes using modified cell-specific CRISPR approaches.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Integration of Circadian Clock Information in theJournal of biological rhythms · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Model and Non-model Insects in Chronobiology.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2020
    Review

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Akira MatsumotoLaboratory for Systems Biology, Center for Developmental Biology, RIKEN, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Maki Ukai-Tadenuma
Rikuhiro G Yamada
Jerry Houl
Kenichiro D Uno
Takeya Kasukawa
Brigitte Dauwalder
Taichi Q Itoh
Kuniaki Takahashi
Ryu Ueda
Paul E Hardin
Teiichi Tanimura
Hiroki R Ueda
Kyushu University · JPNational Institute of Genetics · JPUniversity of Houston · USOsaka University of Economics · JPRIKEN Center for Computational Science · JPTexas A&M University · US

Funding

Regulation of Circadian TranscriptionR01NS052854 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI HARDIN, PAUL E · 2006 to 2014
$2.7M
NINDS NIH HHS NS052854NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Drosophila circadian clock consists of integrated autoregulatory feedback loops, making the clock difficult to elucidate without comprehensively identifying the network components in vivo. Previous studies have adopted genome-wide screening for clock-controlled genes using high-density oligonucleotide arrays that identified hundreds of clock-controlled genes. In an attempt to identify the core clock genes among these candidates, we applied genome-wide functional screening using an RNA interference (RNAi) system in vivo. Here we report the identification of novel clock gene candidates including clockwork orange (cwo), a transcriptional repressor belonging to the basic helix-loop-helix ORANGE family. cwo is rhythmically expressed and directly regulated by CLK-CYC through canonical E-box sequences. A genome-wide search for its target genes using the Drosophila genome tiling array revealed that cwo forms its own negative feedback loop and directly suppresses the expression of other clock genes through the E-box sequence. Furthermore, this negative transcriptional feedback loop contributes to sustaining a high-amplitude circadian oscillation in vivo. Based on these results, we propose that the competition between cyclic CLK-CYC activity and the adjustable threshold imposed by CWO keeps E-box-mediated transcription within the controllable range of its activity, thereby rendering a Drosophila circadian clock capable of generating high-amplitude oscillation.

Indexed as

GenomicsTranscription, GeneticAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBase SequenceBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBiological ClocksCells, CulturedCircadian RhythmCLOCK ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsE-Box ElementsGene Expression RegulationGenome, InsectBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsClk protein, DrosophilaCLOCK ProteinsCwo protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsRepressor ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID17578908
PMCPMC1899476
OpenAlexW2138665253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.