ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2007
Off-label and unlicensed prescribing for children: have we made any progress?
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geometry impact on fundamental properties of theophylline-containing SLS printed pharmaceutical tablets.Frontiers in drug delivery · 2024Article
- Impact of polymer chemistry on critical quality attributes of selective laser sintering 3D printed solid oral dosage forms.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2023Article
- Treating disorders of the neonatal central nervous system: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations with a focus on antiepileptics.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Review
- Comparison of Drug Utilization Patterns in Observational Data: Antiepileptic Drugs in Pediatric Patients.Paediatric drugs · 2015Article
- The science of prescribing.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2012Article
- Pediatric versus adult drug trials for conditions with high pediatric disease burden.Pediatrics · 2012Article
- [Off-label use in child and adolescent psychiatry. An ongoing ethical, medical and legal problem].Der Nervenarzt · 2009Review
- The ethics of psychopharmacological research in legal minors.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.