Trial reportIntensive care medicine2007
Continuous monitoring of ScvO(2) by a new fibre-optic technology compared with blood gas oximetry in critically ill patients: a multicentre study.
Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of hemodynamic goal-directed resuscitation on mortality in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2018Pooled it
- Accuracy and precision of ScvO2 measured with the CeVOX-device: A prospective study in patients with a wide variation of ScvO2-values.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Continuous central venous oxygen saturation assisted intraoperative hemodynamic management during major abdominal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2015Trial
- Evaluation of CI electrode position from imaging: comparison of an automated technique with the established manual method.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Optimization of the target strategy of perioperative infusion therapy based on monitoring data of central hemodynamics in order to prevent complications.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- The Various Oximetric Techniques Used for the Evaluation of Blood Oxygenation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Assessment of Regional Perfusion and Organ Function: Less and Non-invasive Techniques.Frontiers in medicine · 2019Review
- Individualized goal directed perioperative care - the way to go!Frontiers in medicine · 2015Article
- Can we Improve Outcome in High Risk Surgery?Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2013Review
- Costs of intermittent measurement of central venous oxygen saturations by blood gas analysis.Intensive care medicine · 2009Article
- Accuracy of continuous central venous oxygen saturation monitoring in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2008Article
- Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine, 2007. II. Haemodynamics, pneumonia, infections and sepsis, invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, acute respiratory distress syndrome.Intensive care medicine · 2008Review
- Design, analysis, and interpretation of method-comparison studies.AACN advanced critical careReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of the CeVOX monitor measuring continuous central venous saturation (ScvO(2)) with laboratory blood gas oximetry under clinical circumstances.
designProspective, multicentre, observational study.
settingFive adult general intensive care units. PATIENTS AND
participantsFifty-three critically ill patients.
interventionsThe fibre-optic probe was inserted into an ordinary central venous catheter's distal lumen. Blood samples were taken from this line via a Y-adapter every 8 h and ScvO(2) was measured with a laboratory co-oximeter. Patients were observed for a maximum of 5 days. Results were compared using linear regression and the Bland and Altman plots. MEASUREMENTS AND
resultsThe 526 matched pairs of ScvO(2) showed a significant correlation between the two methods (r = 0.79, p< 0.001). Bland-Altman plots showed an overall mean bias of -0.3% and moderate agreement (lower and upper levels of agreement: -13.2% and 12.5%). Correlation for the first time point, and for differences between the first two time points for each method revealed good correlation: (n = 53): r = 0.79, p< 0.001; (n = 50): r = 0.58, p< 0.001, respectively.
conclusionThese results in a heterogeneous group of critically ill patients show that continuous ScvO(2) monitoring by the CeVOX technology yielded results comparable with those obtained by laboratory co-oximetry and therefore can be relied on in everyday clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.