Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17575275›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2007

Immediate-early and delayed primary response genes are distinct in function and genomic architecture.

John W Tullai, Michael E Schaffer, Steven Mullenbrock, Gabriel Sholder, Simon Kasif, Geoffrey M Cooper

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 223 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Cell-type-specific circadian and light-responsive transcriptional dynamics in adultProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John W TullaiDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Michael E Schaffer
Steven Mullenbrock
Gabriel Sholder
Simon Kasif
Geoffrey M Cooper
Boston University · US

Funding

Regulation of apoptosis by PI 3-kinase/Akt signalingR01CA018689 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI COOPER, GEOFFREY M · 1985 to 2012
$6.2M
Comparative Cross-Species Genomic Analysis SystemR33HG002850 · NHGRI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KASIF, SIMON · 2004 to 2006
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA018689NCI NIH HHS R01 CA18689NHGRI NIH HHS R33 HG002850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transcriptional program induced by growth factor stimulation is classically described in two stages as follows: the rapid protein synthesis-independent induction of immediate-early genes, followed by the subsequent protein synthesis-dependent induction of secondary response genes. In this study, we obtained a comprehensive view of this transcriptional program. As expected, we identified both rapid and delayed gene inductions. Surprisingly, however, a large fraction of genes induced with delayed kinetics did not require protein synthesis and therefore represented delayed primary rather than secondary response genes. Of 133 genes induced within 4 h of growth factor stimulation, 49 (37%) were immediate-early genes, 58 (44%) were delayed primary response genes, and 26 (19%) were secondary response genes. Comparison of immediate-early and delayed primary response genes revealed functional and regulatory differences. Whereas many immediate-early genes encoded transcription factors, transcriptional regulators were not prevalent among the delayed primary response genes. The lag in induction of delayed primary response compared with immediate-early mRNAs was because of delays in both transcription initiation and subsequent stages of elongation and processing. Consistent with increased abundance of RNA polymerase II at their promoters, immediate-early genes were characterized by over-representation of transcription factor binding sites and high affinity TATA boxes. Immediate-early genes also had short primary transcripts with few exons, whereas delayed primary response genes more closely resembled other genes in the genome. These findings suggest that genomic features of immediate-early genes, in contrast to the delayed primary response genes, are selected for rapid induction, consistent with their regulatory functions.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationTranscription, GeneticBinding SitesGenes, Immediate-EarlyGenomeIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsKineticsRNA Polymerase IITATA BoxIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsRNA Polymerase II

Identifiers

PMID17575275
PMCPMC2039722
OpenAlexW2108994898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.