Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17573971›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2007

Comparative chloroplast genomics: analyses including new sequences from the angiosperms Nuphar advena and Ranunculus macranthus.

Linda A Raubeson, Rhiannon Peery, Timothy W Chumley, Chris Dziubek, H Matthew Fourcade, Jeffrey L Boore, Robert K Jansen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 267 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
267citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

267 citing papers in PubMed, 470 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plastomes of TenEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Complete Chloroplast Genomes ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Complete Chloroplast Genome of theEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  13. Comparative Plastome Analysis ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Comparative Genomics ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Determination of the Phylogenetic Relationship ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

207 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Linda A RaubesonBiological Sciences, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA 98926-7537, USA. raubeson@cwu.edu
Rhiannon Peery
Timothy W Chumley
Chris Dziubek
H Matthew Fourcade
Jeffrey L Boore
Robert K Jansen
Central Washington University · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of completely sequenced plastid genomes available is growing rapidly. This array of sequences presents new opportunities to perform comparative analyses. In comparative studies, it is often useful to compare across wide phylogenetic spans and, within angiosperms, to include representatives from basally diverging lineages such as the genomes reported here: Nuphar advena (from a basal-most lineage) and Ranunculus macranthus (a basal eudicot). We report these two new plastid genome sequences and make comparisons (within angiosperms, seed plants, or all photosynthetic lineages) to evaluate features such as the status of ycf15 and ycf68 as protein coding genes, the distribution of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and longer dispersed repeats (SDR), and patterns of nucleotide composition.

resultsThe Nuphar [GenBank:NC_008788] and Ranunculus [GenBank:NC_008796] plastid genomes share characteristics of gene content and organization with many other chloroplast genomes. Like other plastid genomes, these genomes are A+T-rich, except for rRNA and tRNA genes. Detailed comparisons of Nuphar with Nymphaea, another Nymphaeaceae, show that more than two-thirds of these genomes exhibit at least 95% sequence identity and that most SSRs are shared. In broader comparisons, SSRs vary among genomes in terms of abundance and length and most contain repeat motifs based on A and T nucleotides.

conclusionSSR and SDR abundance varies by genome and, for SSRs, is proportional to genome size. Long SDRs are rare in the genomes assessed. SSRs occur less frequently than predicted and, although the majority of the repeat motifs do include A and T nucleotides, the A+T bias in SSRs is less than that predicted from the underlying genomic nucleotide composition. In codon usage third positions show an A+T bias, however variation in codon usage does not correlate with differences in A+T-richness. Thus, although plastome nucleotide composition shows "A+T richness", an A+T bias is not apparent upon more in-depth analysis, at least in these aspects. The pattern of evolution in the sequences identified as ycf15 and ycf68 is not consistent with them being protein-coding genes. In fact, these regions show no evidence of sequence conservation beyond what is normal for non-coding regions of the IR.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantGenome, PlantAmino Acid MotifsBase SequenceChloroplastsChromosome MappingComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularGenomeGenomicsModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataNupharRanunculusSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID17573971
PMCPMC1925096
OpenAlexW2060970547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.