Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17571805›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2007

Postnatal development of bacterial population in the gastrointestinal tract of calves.

F Lukás, I Koppová, V Kudrna, J Kopecný

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The fecal bacterial microbiota of healthy and sick newborn foals.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F LukásInstitute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic, 142 20 Prague, Czechia. lukas@iapg.cas.cz
I Koppová
V Kudrna
J Kopecný
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics · CZInstitute of Animal Science · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial 16S rDNA from fecal samples of two calves were amplified by PCR and analyzed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis; selected bands were sequenced. Escherichia coli and Bifidobacterium animalis were the initial colonizers, followed by species closely related to the genera Bacteroides, Clostridium and Faecalibacterium. Change of diet was connected with shifts of bacterial population and with the occurrence of many bacterial species that have not been cultured up to now. The diet change corresponded with an alteration in a volatile-fatty-acid concentration in fecal samples.

Indexed as

Animals, NewbornCattleAnimalsBacteriaBifidobacteriumDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalEcosystemElectrophoresisEscherichia coliFecesGastrointestinal TractPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID17571805
OpenAlexW2167140376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.