Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17571256›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2007

Comparison of intravenous dexketoprofen and dipyrone in acute renal colic.

Juan Sánchez-Carpena, Fermín Domínguez-Hervella, Ignasi García, Emili Gene, Rosendo Bugarín, Angel Martín, Santiago Tomás-Vecina, Dolors García, José Antonio Serrano, Antonio Roman and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for acute renal colic.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Juan Sánchez-CarpenaEmergency Department, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain. sanchez_juacar@gva.es
Fermín Domínguez-Hervella
Ignasi García
Emili Gene
Rosendo Bugarín
Angel Martín
Santiago Tomás-Vecina
Dolors García
José Antonio Serrano
Antonio Roman
Miguel Mariné
María Luisa Mosteiro
Dexketoprofen Renal Colic Study Group
Ajuntament de L’Hospitalet · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Ourense · ESConsorci Sanitari de Terrassa · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESHospital de Sabadell · ESHospital El Escorial · ESHospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer · ESHospital Montecelo · ESHospital Universitario de Guadalajara · ESHospital Universitario Doctor Peset · ESUniversidade de Vigo · ESUniversity Hospital Mútua de Terrassa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a single intravenous (i.v.) bolus of dexketoprofen trometamol compared with an i.v. infusion of dipyrone in patients with moderate to severe pain due to renal colic.

methodsA total of 308 patients with renal colic and visual analog scale (VAS) score >/=40 mm participated in a multicenter, randomized, double blind, double-dummy, parallel, and active-controlled study and were randomized to dexketoprofen 25 mg (n = 101), dexketoprofen 50 mg (n = 104), and dipyrone 2 g (n = 103).

resultsMean [+/- standard deviation (SD)] total pain relief (TOTPAR) scores were similar in the dexketoprofen 50 mg (15.3 +/- 8.6) and dipyrone (15.5 +/- 8.6) and slighly higher than in dexketoprofen 25 mg (13.5 +/- 8.6), although significant differences were not achieved. In the same way, patients in the dexketoprofen 50 mg and dipyrone groups showed higher scores in the sum of pain intensity differences (SPID) and the sum of analogue pain intensity differences (SAPID) than patients in the dexketoprofen 25 mg group, reaching statistical significance in comparison with dexketoprofen 25 mg and dipyrone for SPID and SAPID (p < 0.05). The time-effect course for pain intensity differences and pain relief showed significantly higher values for both doses of dexketoprofen during the first 30 min after drug administration (p < 0.05). Dexketoprofen 50 mg and dipyrone groups had 66% and 70%, respectively, of patients with at least 50% of maximum obtainable TOTPAR in comparison with 56% in the dexketoprofen 25 mg group. The study medications were well tolerated.

conclusionsDexketoprofen 50 mg administered as a single i.v. bolus was effective for the relief of moderate to severe pain in patients with renal colic, with a good safety profile and efficacy similar to i.v. dipyrone 2 g. Dexketoprofen produced analgesia that was faster in onset.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalColicDipyroneDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousInjections, IntravenousKetoprofenKidney DiseasesMaleAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidaldexketoprofen trometamolDipyroneKetoprofenTromethamine

Identifiers

PMID17571256
OpenAlexW2051430160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.