Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17571094›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2007

Rotavirus vaccines: recent developments and future considerations.

Juana Angel, Manuel A Franco, Harry B Greenberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The contribution of bovines to human health against viral infections.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Juana AngelInstituto de Genética Humana, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7, 40-62, Bogotá, Colombia. jangel@javeriana.edu.co
Manuel A Franco
Harry B Greenberg
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana · COStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two new vaccines have recently been shown to be safe and effective in protecting young children against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis. Although both vaccines are now marketed worldwide, it is likely that improvements to these vaccines and/or the development of future generations of rotavirus vaccines will be desirable. This Review addresses recent advances in our knowledge of rotavirus, the host immune response to rotavirus infection and the efficacy and safety of the new vaccines that will be helpful for improving the existing rotavirus vaccines, or developing new rotavirus vaccines in the future.

Indexed as

Rotavirus VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCattleFemaleGastroenteritisHumansInfantMiceRabbitsRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsTreatment OutcomeVaccines, AttenuatedAntibodies, Viralrhesus rotavirus vaccineRotaTeqRotavirus VaccinesVaccines, Attenuated

Identifiers

PMID17571094
OpenAlexW1967528793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.