Trial reportJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2007
The effect of improved readability scores on consumers' perceptions of the quality of health information on the internet.
Trial report in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Trust and Credibility in Web-Based Health Information: A Review and Agenda for Future Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Pooled it
- Low health literacy and evaluation of online health information: a systematic review of the literature.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Pooled it
- Women's Health Information-Seeking Experiences and Preferences for Health Communications on FDA-Regulated Products: A Qualitative Study in Urban Area.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Can consumers trust web-based information about celiac disease? Accuracy, comprehensiveness, transparency, and readability of information on the internet.Interactive journal of medical research · 2012Article
- Investigating the impact of message format, involvement, scientific literacy, and education on attitude toward reducing cancer risk through regulation.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent growth and use of the internet as a source of health information has raised concerns about consumers' ability to comprehend this information. Although health scholars argue that writing web pages at an eighth-grade level or lower will help patients, few studies involve actual readers to investigate the effects of improved readability scores on patients' perceptions of this information.
methodsThis study examines American consumer evaluations of web pages written at different grade reading levels. In spring of 2005, a community-wide intercept survey was performed in a regional hub city in southeastern Ohio. Five hundred nineteen participants were randomly assigned to receive one of three messages discussing lung cancer prevention: one written at the eighth grade level, one at the ninth grade level, and one at the first year college level. Independent t-tests were conducted to compare the messages on measures of perceived trustworthiness, truthfulness, readability, and completeness.
resultsImproving the reading level of online information had no significant effect on consumers' evaluations of the messages' readability or completeness, nor a consistent effect on the perceived truthfulness or trustworthiness of the message.
conclusionsThe results suggest that by simply changing the readability level of online information may not improve consumers' evaluation of the quality of health information on the internet. The authors offer alternative possibilities for why some sources of online health information may be seen as more valuable than others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17570803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.