Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17568016›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2007

Molecular insights into segmentation along the proximal-distal axis of the nephron.

Raphael Kopan, Hui-Teng Cheng, Kameswaran Surendran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The kidney stroma in development and disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Measurement of adhesion and traction of cells at high yield reveals an energetic ratchet operating during nephron condensation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Modeling Renal Disease "On the Fly".BioMed research international · 2018
    Review
  12. Making new kidneys: On the road from science fiction to science fact.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2016
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Functional genetic targeting of embryonic kidney progenitor cells ex vivo.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Hnf1beta and nephron segmentation.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raphael KopanDepartment of Molecular Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA. kopan@wustl.edu
Hui-Teng Cheng
Kameswaran Surendran

Funding

ROLE OF NOTCH AND KIDNEY DEVELOPMENTR01DK066408 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KOPAN, RAPHAEL · 2004 to 2012
$3.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK066408NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK066408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structure of a mammalian kidney is parsed into large collections of polarized nephrons, and each segment is home to a diverse community of cells that specialize in renal endocrine and excretory functions. Early developmental lengthening and diversification of nephron segments along a proximal--distal axis initiate all subsequent facets of tubular growth and function. Morphogenic cues and biochemical interactions that are critical to this process are starting to emerge. The underlying principles of regional cell signaling and transcriptional control organizing early segmentation are the subject of this review.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationEpitheliumMesodermNephronsTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID17568016
PMCPMC2375141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.