Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17568004›Full record

ArticleGenome research2007

Pan-S replication patterns and chromosomal domains defined by genome-tiling arrays of ENCODE genomic areas.

Neerja Karnani, Christopher Taylor, Ankit Malhotra, Anindya Dutta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cell cycle control in the early embryonic development of aquatic animal species.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. DNA replication timing.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Sorting DNA with asymmetry: a new player in gene regulation?Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2013
    Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Neerja KarnaniDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.
Christopher Taylor
Ankit Malhotra
Anindya Dutta

Funding

The role of MCM8-9 in genomic instability of cancersR01CA060499 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Anindya Dutta · 1994 to 2026
$8.6M
Mapping replication elements on human chromosomesU01HG003157 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI DUTTA, ANINDYA · 2003 to 2007
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA060499NHGRI NIH HHS HG003157NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG003157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In eukaryotes, accurate control of replication time is required for the efficient completion of S phase and maintenance of genome stability. We present a high-resolution genome-tiling array-based profile of replication timing for approximately 1% of the human genome studied by The ENCODE Project Consortium. Twenty percent of the investigated segments replicate asynchronously (pan-S). These areas are rich in genes and CpG islands, features they share with early-replicating loci. Interphase FISH showed that pan-S replication is a consequence of interallelic variation in replication time and is not an artifact derived from a specific cell cycle synchronization method or from aneuploidy. The interallelic variation in replication time is likely due to interallelic variation in chromatin environment, because while the early- or late-replicating areas were exclusively enriched in activating or repressing histone modifications, respectively, the pan-S areas had both types of histone modification. The replication profile of the chromosomes identified contiguous chromosomal segments of hundreds of kilobases separated by smaller segments where the replication time underwent an acute transition. Close examination of one such segment demonstrated that the delay of replication time was accompanied by a decrease in level of gene expression and appearance of repressive chromatin marks, suggesting that the transition segments are boundary elements separating chromosomal domains with different chromatin environments.

Indexed as

ChromatinChromosomes, HumanDNA ReplicationGene Expression ProfilingGenome, HumanGenomic InstabilityHeLa CellsHistonesHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalQuantitative Trait LociS PhaseChromatinHistones

Identifiers

PMID17568004
PMCPMC1891345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.