Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17567919›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2007

Evaluation of sample size effect on the identification of haplotype blocks.

Dai Osabe, Toshihito Tanahashi, Kyoko Nomura, Shuichi Shinohara, Naoto Nakamura, Toshikazu Yoshikawa, Hiroshi Shiota, Parvaneh Keshavarz, Yuka Yamaguchi, Kiyoshi Kunika and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome-to-phenome research in rats: progress and perspectives.International journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Dai OsabeDepartment of Bioinformatics, Division of Life Science Systems, Fujitsu Limited, Higashishinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan. d_osabe@jp.fujitsu.com <d_osabe@jp.fujitsu.com>
Toshihito Tanahashi
Kyoko Nomura
Shuichi Shinohara
Naoto Nakamura
Toshikazu Yoshikawa
Hiroshi Shiota
Parvaneh Keshavarz
Yuka Yamaguchi
Kiyoshi Kunika
Maki Moritani
Hiroshi Inoue
Mitsuo Itakura

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome-wide maps of linkage disequilibrium (LD) and haplotypes have been created for different populations. Substantial sharing of the boundaries and haplotypes among populations was observed, but haplotype variations have also been reported across populations. Conflicting observations on the extent and distribution of haplotypes require careful examination. The mechanisms that shape haplotypes have not been fully explored, although the effect of sample size has been implicated. We present a close examination of the effect of sample size on haplotype blocks using an original computational simulation.

resultsA region spanning 19.31 Mb on chromosome 20q was genotyped for 1,147 SNPs in 725 Japanese subjects. One region of 445 kb exhibiting a single strong LD value (average |D'|; 0.94) was selected for the analysis of sample size effect on haplotype structure. Three different block definitions (recombination-based, LD-based, and diversity-based) were exploited to create simulations for block identification with theta value from real genotyping data. As a result, it was quite difficult to estimate a haplotype block for data with less than 200 samples. Attainment of a reliable haplotype structure with 50 samples was not possible, although the simulation was repeated 10,000 times.

conclusionThese analyses underscored the difficulties of estimating haplotype blocks. To acquire a reliable result, it would be necessary to increase sample size more than 725 and to repeat the simulation 3,000 times. Even in one genomic region showing a high LD value, the haplotype block might be fragile. We emphasize the importance of applying careful confidence measures when using the estimated haplotype structure in biomedical research.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticModels, StatisticalChromosome MappingChromosomes, Human, Pair 20Computer SimulationGenetic VariationHaplotypesHumansLinkage DisequilibriumSample SizeSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID17567919
PMCPMC1913927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.