Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17567891›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2007

Rapid detection of Mycobacterium bovis DNA in cattle lymph nodes with visible lesions using PCR.

G Michael Taylor, Danny R Worth, Si Palmer, Keith Jahans, R Glyn Hewinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of qPCR methods for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis from granulomas collected at slaughterhouses.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. PlasmaInfectious diseases (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  6. Genetic diversity and antibiotic resistance ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Challenge Dose Titration in aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Droplet digital PCR as alternative to microbiological culture forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Video Endoscopy-Guided Intrabronchial Spray Inoculation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Real-Time PCR Validation forFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  20. Validation of real-time PCR technique for detection of Mycobacterium bovis and Brucella abortus in bovine raw milk.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G Michael TaylorCentre for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Flowers Building, Imperial College, London, UK. gm.taylor@imperial.ac.uk
Danny R Worth
Si Palmer
Keith Jahans
R Glyn Hewinson
Veterinary Medicines Directorate · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe have evaluated a sensitive screening assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) complex organisms and a specific assay for detecting Mycobacterium bovis DNA in lymph nodes taken from cattle with evidence of bovine tuberculosis. Underlying these series of experiments was the need for a versatile DNA extraction protocol which could handle tissue samples and with the potential for automation.The target for the screening assay was the multi-copy insertion element IS1081, present in 6 copies in the MTB complex. For confirmation of M. bovis we used primers flanking a specific deletion in the genome of M. bovis known as region of difference 4 (RD4). The sensitivity and specificity of these PCRs has been tested on genomic DNA from MTB complex reference strains, mycobacteria other than tuberculosis (MOTT), spiked samples and on clinical material.

resultsThe minimum detection limits of the IS1081 method was < I genome copy and for the RD4 PCR was 5 genome copies. Both methods can be readily adapted for quantitative PCR with the use of SYBR Green intercalating dye on the RotorGene 3000 platform (Corbett Research). Initial testing of field samples of bovine lymph nodes with visible lesions (VL, n = 109) highlighted two shortfalls of the molecular approach. Firstly, comparison of IS1081 PCR with the "gold standard" of culture showed a sensitivity of approximately 70%. The sensitivity of the RD4 PCR method was 50%. Secondly, the success rate of spoligotyping applied directly to clinical material was 51% compared with cultures. A series of further experiments indicated that the discrepancy between sensitivity of detection found with purified mycobacterial DNA and direct testing of field samples was due to limited mycobacterial DNA recovery from tissue homogenates rather than PCR inhibition. The resilient mycobacterial cell wall, the presence of tissue debris and the paucibacillary nature of some cattle VL tissue may all contribute to this observation. Any of these factors may restrict application of other more discriminant typing methods.A simple means of increasing the efficiency of mycobacterial DNA recovery was assessed using a further pool of 95 cattle VL. Following modification of the extraction protocol, detection rate with the IS1081 and RD4 methods increased to 91% and 59% respectively.

conclusionThe IS1081 PCR is a realistic screening method for rapid identification of positive cases but the sensitivity of single copy methods, like RD4 and also of spoligotyping will need to be improved to make these applicable for direct testing of tissue extracts.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriological TechniquesCattleDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA Transposable ElementsLymph NodesMycobacterium bovisPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosis, BovineDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID17567891
PMCPMC1904440
OpenAlexW2096202905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.