Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17567744›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2007

A high-throughput method for membrane protein solubility screening: the ultracentrifugation dispersity sedimentation assay.

Daniel A P Gutmann, Eiichi Mizohata, Simon Newstead, Sebastian Ferrandon, Vincent Postis, Xiaobing Xia, Peter J F Henderson, Hendrik W van Veen, Bernadette Byrne

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging for the analysis of biopharmaceuticals.Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. In Situ Reconstitution of the Adenosine AJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Membrane proteins: always an insoluble problem?Biochemical Society transactions · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Engineering an ultra-thermostable β(1)-adrenoceptor.Journal of molecular biology · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Postis, Vincent [added]; Xia, Xiaobing [added]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel A P GutmannMembrane Protein Crystallography Group, Division of Molecular Biosciences, Imperial College London, UK.
Eiichi Mizohata
Simon Newstead
Sebastian Ferrandon
Vincent Postis
Xiaobing Xia
Peter J F Henderson
Hendrik W van Veen
Bernadette Byrne
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0401165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One key to successful crystallization of membrane proteins is the identification of detergents that maintain the protein in a soluble, monodispersed state. Because of their hydrophobic nature, membrane proteins are particularly prone to forming insoluble aggregates over time. This nonspecific aggregation of the molecules reduces the likelihood of the regular association of the protein molecules essential for crystal lattice formation. Critical buffer components affecting the aggregation of membrane proteins include detergent choice, salt concentration, and presence of glycerol. The optimization of these parameters is often a time- and protein-consuming process. Here we describe a novel ultracentrifugation dispersity sedimentation (UDS) assay in which ultracentrifugation of very small (5 microL) volumes of purified, soluble membrane protein is combined with SDS-PAGE analysis to rapidly assess the degree of protein aggregation. The results from the UDS method correlate very well with established methods like size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), while consuming considerably less protein. In addition, the UDS method allows rapid screening of detergents for membrane protein crystallization in a fraction of the time required by SEC. Here we use the UDS method in the identification of suitable detergents and buffer compositions for the crystallization of three recombinant prokaryotic membrane proteins. The implications of our results for membrane protein crystallization prescreening are discussed.

Indexed as

Chromatography, GelCrystallography, X-RayDetergentsElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelMembrane ProteinsSolubilityUltracentrifugationDetergentsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17567744
PMCPMC2206705
OpenAlexW1995570967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.