ArticlePloS one2007
Differentiating between near- and non-cognate codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Article in PloS one, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Near-cognate tRNAs dominate codon decoding times in simulated ribosomes.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Human protein synthesis requires aminoacyl-tRNA pivoting during proofreading.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Comparative analyses of disease-linked missense mutations in the RNA exosome modeled in budding yeast reveal distinct functional consequences in translation.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Phosphorylation of P-stalk proteins defines the ribosomal state for interaction with auxiliary protein factors.EMBO reports · 2024Article
- On the response of elongating ribosomes to forces opposing translocation.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 uses a specific tRNARNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Loss of Conserved rRNA Modifications in the Peptidyl Transferase Center Leads to Diminished Protein Synthesis and Cell Growth in Budding Yeast.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Translation ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Review
- Translational control in neurovascular brain development.Royal Society open science · 2021Review
- Control of translation elongation in health and disease.Disease models & mechanisms · 2020Review
- Hidden patterns of codon usage bias across kingdoms.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020Article
- Non-translational Connections of eEF1B in the Cytoplasm and Nucleus of Cancer Cells.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Review
- Article
- Tautomeric G•U pairs within the molecular ribosomal grip and fidelity of decoding in bacteria.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Translation fidelity coevolves with longevity.Aging cell · 2017Article
- Multiplication of Ribosomal P-Stalk Proteins Contributes to the Fidelity of Translation.Molecular and cellular biology · 2017Article
- Ribosome dynamics during decoding.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017Review
- A Ribosomopathy Reveals Decoding Defective Ribosomes Driving Human Dysmorphism.American journal of human genetics · 2017Article
- Review
- Functional analysis of the uL11 protein impact on translational machinery.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDecoding of mRNAs is performed by aminoacyl tRNAs (aa-tRNAs). This process is highly accurate, however, at low frequencies (10(-3) - 10(-4)) the wrong aa-tRNA can be selected, leading to incorporation of aberrant amino acids. Although our understanding of what constitutes the correct or cognate aa-tRNA:mRNA interaction is well defined, a functional distinction between near-cognate or single mismatched, and unpaired or non-cognate interactions is lacking. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsMisreading of several synonymous codon substitutions at the catalytic site of firefly luciferase was assayed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Analysis of the results in the context of current kinetic and biophysical models of aa-tRNA selection suggests that the defining feature of near-cognate aa-tRNAs is their potential to form mini-helical structures with A-site codons, enabling stimulation of GTPase activity of eukaryotic Elongation Factor 1A (eEF1A). Paromomycin specifically stimulated misreading of near-cognate but not of non-cognate aa-tRNAs, providing a functional probe to distinguish between these two classes. Deletion of the accessory elongation factor eEF1Bgamma promoted increased misreading of near-cognate, but hyperaccurate reading of non-cognate codons, suggesting that this factor also has a role in tRNA discrimination. A mutant of eEF1Balpha, the nucleotide exchange factor for eEF1A, promoted a general increase in fidelity, suggesting that the decreased rates of elongation may provide more time for discrimination between aa-tRNAs. A mutant form of ribosomal protein L5 promoted hyperaccurate decoding of both types of codons, even though it is topologically distant from the decoding center. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: It is important to distinguish between near-cognate and non-cognate mRNA:tRNA interactions, because such a definition may be important for informing therapeutic strategies for suppressing these two different categories of mutations underlying many human diseases. This study suggests that the defining feature of near-cognate aa-tRNAs is their potential to form mini-helical structures with A-site codons in the ribosomal decoding center. An aminoglycoside and a ribosomal factor can be used to distinguish between near-cognate and non-cognate interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.