Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17564728›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2007

Long-term follow-up of Argentinean patients with hemolytic uremic syndrome who had not undergone dialysis.

Carlos J Cobeñas, Laura F Alconcher, Ana P Spizzirri, Ricardo C Rahman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Shiga toxin-producingMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Long-term outcomes of Shiga toxin hemolytic uremic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2013
    Review
  15. Subtyping of STEC by MLVA in Argentina.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2012
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlos J CobeñasNephrology Department, Hospital de Niños Superiora Sor María Ludovica, 14 No. 1631, La Plata 1900, Argentina. carlos.cobenas@speedy.com.ar
Laura F Alconcher
Ana P Spizzirri
Ricardo C Rahman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the records of patients with hemolytic uremic syndrome, who had not undergone dialysis during the acute stage, with the aims of evaluating: (1) the outcome after at least 5 years of follow-up; (2) the value of peak serum creatinine as a prognostic marker; (3) the relationship between outcome and time to normalization of renal function. From 1968 to 2000, 1,179 patients were assisted. Forty-two patients (3.6%) died during the acute stage, 478 patients (40.5%) required dialysis and 659 patients (55.9%) did not undergo dialysis; 529 non-dialysis patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 130 patients were classified into four groups: group I, complete recovery; group II, with two subgroups, IIa, microalbuminuria, and IIb, proteinuria and/or high blood pressure, both with normal renal function; group III, chronic renal failure; and group IV, end-stage renal disease. We analyzed the relationship between final outcome and: (1) peak creatinine (the highest of at least two determinations) during the acute stage and (2) time to normalization of urea and/or creatinine after the acute stage. After a mean follow-up time of 147.1 months (range 60-362 months), group I had 83 patients (63.9%), group IIa had 27 (20.8%), group IIb had 15 (11.5%) and group III had 5 (3.8%). The value of peak serum creatinine concentration was available for 57 patients. On the last clinical visit, eight out of 26 (30.7%) patients with peak serum creatinine equal to or higher than 1.5 mg/dl were in groups IIb and III versus one out of 31 (3.2%) patients with lower values (P < or = 0.007). Finally, six out of 28 patients (21%) whose renal function had normalized after 15 days from diagnosis were in groups IIb-III versus 8/82 (9.7%) whose renal function had normalized within 15 days (P = 0.18). After a mean period of follow-up of 12 years, 15% of a selected patient group had developed proteinuria, high blood pressure or chronic renal failure, and 21% had developed microalbuminuria. Peak serum creatinine during the acute stage was useful as a prognostic indicator. Patients whose renal function required more time to normalize did not have a worse outcome.

Indexed as

ArgentinaChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHemolytic-Uremic SyndromeHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesTime Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.