Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17563874›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2007

Enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration: a randomized controlled crossover study.

Michael Joannidis, Jordan Kountchev, Markus Rauchenzauner, Nicola Schusterschitz, Hanno Ulmer, Andreas Mayr, Romuald Bellmann

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Management of acute kidney injury in patients with COVID-19.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2020
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Renal Replacement Therapy in the Critical Care Setting.Critical care research and practice · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael JoannidisMedical University Innsbruck, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Intensive Care Unit, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Michael.Joannidis@i-med.ac.at
Jordan Kountchev
Markus Rauchenzauner
Nicola Schusterschitz
Hanno Ulmer
Andreas Mayr
Romuald Bellmann
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin as anticoagulant in continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) compared with unfractionated heparin.

designProspective randomized controlled crossover study.

settingMedical and Surgical Intensive Care Unit of a University Hospital. PATIENTS: Forty consecutive adult medical and surgical ICU patients with normal anticoagulation parameters requiring CVVH.

interventionCVVH was performed with pre-filter fluid replacement at 2500 ml/h and blood flow rates of 180 ml/min. Heparin-treated patients received an initial pre-filter bolus of 30 IU/kg and a maintenance infusion at 7 units/kg h(-1), titrated to achieve a systemic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) of 40-45 s. Enoxaparin-treated patients received an initial pre-filter bolus of 0.15 mg/kg and a maintenance infusion starting at 0.05 mg/kg h(-1), which was subsequently adjusted to maintain systemic anti-factor Xa activity (anti-Xa) at 0.25-0.30 IU/ml. Each patient received both regimens in a crossover design. Maximum treatment duration for each set was 72 h.

resultsPatients included had a mean APACHE II score of 22 (10-35). Thirty-seven patients completed both study arms. Mean filter life span was 21.7 h (+/- 16.9 h) for heparin and 30.6 h (+/- 25.3) for enoxaparin (p = 0.017, ANOVA for repeated measures). One major bleeding episode occurred during heparin as well as during enoxaparin treatment. Cost analysis showed average daily costs of 270 and 240 euro for heparin and enoxaparin, respectively.

conclusionEnoxaparin can be safely used for anticoagulation during CVVH resulting in higher filter lifespan compared with unfractionated heparin.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsAPACHECost-Benefit AnalysisCross-Over StudiesEnoxaparinFemaleHemofiltrationHeparinHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMembranes, ArtificialMiddle AgedAnticoagulantsEnoxaparinHeparinMembranes, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID17563874
OpenAlexW2119483013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.