Trial reportClinical drug investigation2007
Double-blind comparison of escitalopram and duloxetine in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Less is more in antidepressant clinical trials: a meta-analysis of the effect of visit frequency on treatment response and dropout.The Journal of clinical psychiatry · 2013Pooled it
- Duloxetine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- The general and comparative efficacy and safety of duloxetine in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Drug safety · 2009Pooled it
- Early non-response in patients with severe depression: escitalopram up-titration versus switch to duloxetine.Clinical drug investigation · 2012Trial
- The impact of analytic method on interpretation of outcomes in longitudinal clinical trials.International journal of clinical practice · 2008Trial
- Escitalopram and duloxetine in major depressive disorder: a pharmacoeconomic comparison using UK cost data.PharmacoEconomics · 2008Trial
- Significant Differences and Experimental Designs Do Not Necessarily Imply Clinical Relevance: Effect Sizes and Causality Claims in Antidepressant Treatments.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Adherence to, and Persistence of, Antidepressant Therapy in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: Results from a Population-based Study in Italy.Current neuropharmacology · 2023Article
- Conditional power of antidepressant network meta-analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2021Article
- Acceptability of escitalopram versus duloxetine in outpatients with depression who did not respond to initial second-generation antidepressants: Study protocol for a randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2019Article
- Temporal Profiles and Dose-Responsiveness of Side Effects with Escitalopram and Duloxetine in Treatment-Naïve Depressed Adults.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Escitalopram vs duloxetine in acute treatment of major depressive disorder: meta-analysis and systematic review.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2018Article
- Treatment discontinuation and tolerability as a function of dose and titration of duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2016Article
- Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of New Generation Antidepressants.CNS drugs · 2015Review
- Efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg once daily in major depressive disorder: a review with expert commentary.Drugs in context · 2013Review
- A critical review of model-based economic studies of depression: modelling techniques, model structure and data sources.PharmacoEconomics · 2012Review
- Escitalopram for the management of major depressive disorder: a review of its efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability.Patient preference and adherence · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveEscitalopram is the most selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant; in contrast, duloxetine inhibits both serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake. Double-blind comparison studies may help guide treatment decisions by revealing the relative benefits of different therapeutic approaches. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of escitalopram versus duloxetine in the acute treatment of patients with moderate to severe major depressive disorder.
methodsA 1-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period followed by an 8-week, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group comparison was conducted from 20 April 2005 to 10 March 2006 in independent psychiatric research facilities with principal investigators who were board certified in psychiatry. A total of 278 outpatients of 382 patients screened with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edition)-diagnosed major depressive disorder (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] total score > or =26) were randomised to the two treatment groups. Eight patients received no medication and were excluded from the safety group. Patients were treated with either escitalopram 10-20 mg/day (fixed at 10 mg/day for the first 4 weeks) or duloxetine 60 mg/day. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline at week 8 in MADRS total score using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach. Efficacy, safety and tolerability measures were prospectively defined in the statistical analysis plan prior to study initiation unless otherwise specifically noted as conducted post hoc.
resultsA significantly greater proportion of escitalopram-treated patients completed the 8-week study compared with duloxetine-treated patients (87% vs 69%, respectively; p < 0.01). Mean baseline MADRS total scores were 31.0 for the escitalopram group and 31.6 for the duloxetine group. At week 8, escitalopram treatment resulted in significantly greater improvement compared with duloxetine on the prospectively defined primary efficacy endpoint of mean change from baseline in MADRS total score using the LOCF approach (least-squares mean difference [LSMD] -2.42; 95% CI -4.73, -0.11; p < 0.05). There was no difference between treatment groups in the observed cases (OC) analysis (LSMD -0.32; 95% CI -2.71, 2.07; p = 0.79). Significantly fewer escitalopram-treated patients discontinued because of adverse events compared with duloxetine (2% vs 13%, respectively; p < 0.01).
conclusionThese findings suggest that escitalopram is better tolerated and at least as effective as the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.