Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17562183›Full record

ReviewJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2007

Heroin-assisted treatment (HAT) a decade later: a brief update on science and politics.

Benedikt Fischer, Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes, Peter Blanken, Christian Haasen, Jürgen Rehm, Martin T Schechter, John Strang, Wim van den Brink

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Nontraditional Alcohol and Opioid Agonist Treatment Interventions.The Medical clinics of North America · 2018
    Review
  18. Ethical Issues in Research Involving Participants With Opioid Use Disorder.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benedikt FischerCentre for Addictions Research of British Columbia, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada. bfisher@uvic.ca
Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes
Peter Blanken
Christian Haasen
Jürgen Rehm
Martin T Schechter
John Strang
Wim van den Brink

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the initial Swiss heroin-assisted treatment (HAT) study conducted in the mid-1990s, several other jurisdictions in Europe and North America have implemented HAT trials. All of these studies embrace the same goal-investigating the utility of medical heroin prescribing for problematic opioid users-yet are distinct in various key details. This paper briefly reviews (initiated or completed) studies and their main parameters, including primary research objectives, design, target populations, outcome measures, current status and-where available-key results. We conclude this overview with some final observations on a decade of intensive HAT research in the jurisdictions examined, including the suggestion that there is a mounting onus on the realm of politics to translate the-largely positive-data from completed HAT science into corresponding policy and programming in order to expand effective treatment options for the high-risk population of illicit opioid users.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidCanadaEuropeHealth PolicyHeroinHeroin DependenceHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPoliticsPublic OpinionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesics, OpioidHeroin

Identifiers

PMID17562183
PMCPMC2219559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.