Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17562012›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2007

A complex and punctate distribution of three eukaryotic genes derived by lateral gene transfer.

Matthew B Rogers, Russell F Watkins, James T Harper, Dion G Durnford, Michael W Gray, Patrick J Keeling

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of codon message on xylanase thermal activity.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The endosymbiotic origin, diversification and fate of plastids.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Darwinian evolution in the light of genomics.Nucleic acids research · 2009
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew B RogersDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. mbrogers@interchange.ubc.ca <mbrogers@interchange.ubc.ca>
Russell F Watkins
James T Harper
Dion G Durnford
Michael W Gray
Patrick J Keeling
University of British Columbia · CADalhousie University · CAUniversity of New Brunswick · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLateral gene transfer is increasingly invoked to explain phylogenetic results that conflict with our understanding of organismal relationships. In eukaryotes, the most common observation interpreted in this way is the appearance of a bacterial gene (one that is not clearly derived from the mitochondrion or plastid) in a eukaryotic nuclear genome. Ideally such an observation would involve a single eukaryote or a small group of related eukaryotes encoding a gene from a specific bacterial lineage.

resultsHere we show that several apparently simple cases of lateral transfer are actually more complex than they originally appeared: in these instances we find that two or more distantly related eukaryotic groups share the same bacterial gene, resulting in a punctate distribution. Specifically, we describe phylogenies of three core carbon metabolic enzymes: transketolase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and ribulose-5-phosphate-3-epimerase. Phylogenetic trees of each of these enzymes includes a strongly-supported clade consisting of several eukaryotes that are distantly related at the organismal level, but whose enzymes are apparently all derived from the same lateral transfer. With less sampling any one of these examples would appear to be a simple case of bacterium-to-eukaryote lateral transfer; taken together, their evolutionary histories cannot be so simple. The distributions of these genes may represent ancient paralogy events or genes that have been transferred from bacteria to an ancient ancestor of the eukaryotes that retain them. They may alternatively have been transferred laterally from a bacterium to a single eukaryotic lineage and subsequently transferred between distantly related eukaryotes.

conclusionDetermining how complex the distribution of a transferred gene is depends on the sampling available. These results show that seemingly simple cases may be revealed to be more complex with greater sampling, suggesting many bacterial genes found in eukaryotic genomes may have a punctate distribution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenesGene Transfer, HorizontalAnimalsBacteriaBacterial ProteinsCarbohydrate EpimerasesConserved SequenceDNAEukaryotic CellsExpressed Sequence TagsGenes, BacterialGlyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (NADP+)Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (NADP+)(Phosphorylating)Molecular Sequence DataSpecies SpecificityBacterial ProteinsCarbohydrate EpimerasesDNAGlyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (NADP+)Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (NADP+)(Phosphorylating)ribulosephosphate 3-epimeraseTransketolase

Identifiers

PMID17562012
PMCPMC1920508
OpenAlexW2167535206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.