Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17558493›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2007

Antibiotic management of suspected nosocomial ICU-acquired infection: does prolonged empiric therapy improve outcome?

Mary-Anne W Aarts, Christian Brun-Buisson, Deborah J Cook, Anand Kumar, Steven Opal, Graeme Rocker, Terry Smith, Jean-Louis Vincent, John C Marshall

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [S3 Guideline Sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and aftercare : Long version].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Prediction Score ofInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa for COPD exacerbation in ICU: a 10-year retrospective study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2015
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Duration of antibiotic therapy for critically ill patients with bloodstream infections: A retrospective cohort study.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mary-Anne W AartsUniversity of Toronto, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine and the Department of Surgery, Toronto, Canada.
Christian Brun-Buisson
Deborah J Cook
Anand Kumar
Steven Opal
Graeme Rocker
Terry Smith
Jean-Louis Vincent
John C Marshall

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize empiric antibiotic use in patients with suspected nosocomial ICU-acquired infections (NI), and determine the impact of prolonged therapy in the absence of infection. DESIGN AND

settingMulticenter prospective cohort, with eight medical-surgical ICUs in North America and Europe. PATIENTS: 195 patients with suspected NI.

methodsThe diagnosis of NI was adjudicated by a blinded Clinical Evaluation Committee using retrospective review of clinical, radiological, and culture data.

resultsEmpiric antibiotics were prescribed for 143 of 195 (73.3%) patients with suspected NI; only 39 of 195 (20.0%) were adjudicated as being infected. Infection rates were similar in patients who did (26 of 143, 18.2%), or did not (13 of 52, 25.0%) receive empiric therapy (p = 0.3). Empiric antibiotics were continued for more than 4 days in 56 of 95 (59.0%) patients without adjudicated NI. Factors associated with continued empiric therapy were increased age (p = 0.02), ongoing SIRS (p = 0.03), and hospital (p = 0.004). Patients without NI who received empiric antibiotics for longer than 4 days had increased 28-day mortality (18 of 56, 32.1%), compared with those whose antibiotics were discontinued (3 of 39, 7.7%; OR = 5.7, 95% CI 1.5-20.9, p = 0.005). When the influence of age, admission diagnosis, vasopressor use, and multiple organ dysfunction was controlled by multivariable analysis, prolonged empiric therapy was not independently associated with mortality (OR = 3.8, 95% CI 0.9-15.5, p = 0.07).

conclusionsEmpiric antibiotics were initiated four times more often than NI was confirmed, and frequently continued in the absence of infection. We found no evidence that prolonged use of empiric antibiotics improved outcome for ICU patients, but rather a suggestion that the practice may be harmful.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCohort StudiesCross InfectionDeveloped CountriesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.