Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17557832›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2007

Comparative analysis of expressed genes from cacao meristems infected by Moniliophthora perniciosa.

Abelmon S Gesteira, Fabienne Micheli, Nicolas Carels, Aline C Da Silva, Karina P Gramacho, Ivan Schuster, Joci N Macêdo, Gonçalo A G Pereira, Júlio C M Cascardo

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Developing Blight-Tolerant American Chestnut Trees.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Abelmon S GesteiraDCB/UESC, Laboratório de Genômica e Expressão Gênica, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brasil.
Fabienne Micheli
Nicolas Carels
Aline C Da Silva
Karina P Gramacho
Ivan Schuster
Joci N Macêdo
Gonçalo A G Pereira
Júlio C M Cascardo
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRComissão Executiva do Plano da Lavoura Cacaueira · BRInesc P&D Brasil · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsWitches' broom disease is caused by the hemibiotrophic basidiomycete Moniliophthora perniciosa, and is one of the most important diseases of cacao in the western hemisphere. Because very little is known about the global process of such disease development, expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were used to identify genes expressed during the Theobroma cacao-Moniliophthora perniciosa interaction.

methodsTwo cDNA libraries corresponding to the resistant (RT) and susceptible (SP) cacao-M. perniciosa interactions were constructed from total RNA, using the DB SMART Creator cDNA library kit (Clontech). Clones were randomly selected, sequenced from the 5' end and analysed using bioinformatics tools including in silico analysis of the differential gene expression. KEY

resultsA total of 6884 ESTs were generated from the RT and SP cDNA libraries. These ESTs were composed of 2585 singlets and 341 contigs for a total of 2926 non-redundant sequences. The redundancy of the libraries was low and their specificity high when compared with the few other cacao libraries already published. Sequence analysis allowed the assignment of a putative functional category for 54 % of sequences, whereas approx. 22 % of sequences corresponded to unknown function and approx. 24 % of sequences did not show any significant similarity with other proteins present in the database. Despite the similar overall distribution of the sequences in functional categories between the two libraries, qualitative differences were observed. Genes involved during the defence response to pathogen infection or in programmed cell death were identified, such as pathogenesis related-proteins, trypsin inhibitor or oxalate oxidase, and some of them showed an in silico differential expression between the resistant and the susceptible interactions.

conclusionsAs far as is known this is the first EST resource from the cacao-M. perniciosa interaction and it is believed that it will provide a significant contribution to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the resistance and susceptibility of cacao to M. perniciosa, to develop strategies to control witches' broom, and as a source of polymorphism for molecular marker development and marker-assisted selection.

Indexed as

AgaricalesCacaoComputational BiologyExpressed Sequence TagsGene Expression ProfilingGene LibraryImmunity, InnateMeristemPlant DiseasesSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID17557832
PMCPMC2735303
OpenAlexW2119827144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.