Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17557180›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2007

Comparative genomics reveals functional transcriptional control sequences in the Prop1 gene.

Robert D Ward, Shannon W Davis, Minchul Cho, Constance Esposito, Robert H Lyons, Jan-Fang Cheng, Edward M Rubin, Simon J Rhodes, Lori T Raetzman, Timothy P L Smith and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robert D WardGraduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Shannon W Davis
Minchul Cho
Constance Esposito
Robert H Lyons
Jan-Fang Cheng
Edward M Rubin
Simon J Rhodes
Lori T Raetzman
Timothy P L Smith
Sally A Camper
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USJoint Genome Institute · USIndiana University · USRoman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center · US

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007863 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COLLINS, KATHLEEN L. · 1985 to 2024
$38.3M
CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AT MICHIGANT32GM007315 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PUTHENVEEDU, MANOJKUMAR A · 1985 to 2021
$12.8M
CELL-SPECIFIC EXPRESSION IN THE PITUITARY GLANDR01HD034283 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CAMPER, SALLY A. · 1996 to 2021
$7.7M
A Panhypopitutitary Mouse MutationR37HD030428 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CAMPER, SALLY A. · 2002 to 2011
$3.4M
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MULTIPURPOSE ARTHRITIS CENTERP60AR020557 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SOWERS, MARYFRAN R · 1986 to 2001
$2.9M
TRAINING FOR RESEARCH IN GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007367 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI OWYANG, CHUNG · 1986 to 2009
$2.7M
The role of Prop1 in pituitary cell proliferationF32DK060306 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI RAETZMAN, LORI T · 2001 to 2002
$79k
NCI NIH HHS CA46592NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NIAMS NIH HHS AR20557NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD034283NICHD NIH HHS R01HD34283NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD030428NICHD NIH HHS R37HD30428NIDDK NIH HHS DK07367NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK060306NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK60306NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007367NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007315NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007863NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM07315NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM07863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in PROP1 are a common genetic cause of multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD). We used a comparative genomics approach to predict the transcriptional regulatory domains of Prop1 and tested them in cell culture and mice. A BAC transgene containing Prop1 completely rescues the Prop1 mutant phenotype, demonstrating that the regulatory elements necessary for proper PROP1 transcription are contained within the BAC. We generated DNA sequences from the PROP1 genes in lemur, pig, and five different primate species. Comparison of these with available human and mouse PROP1 sequences identified three putative regulatory sequences that are highly conserved. These are located in the PROP1 promoter proximal region, within the first intron of PROP1, and downstream of PROP1. Each of the conserved elements elicited orientation-specific enhancer activity in the context of the Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase minimal promoter in both heterologous and pituitary-derived cells lines. The intronic element is sufficient to confer dorsal expansion of the pituitary expression domain of a transgene, suggesting that this element is important for the normal spatial expression of endogenous Prop1 during pituitary development. This study illustrates the usefulness of a comparative genomics approach in the identification of regulatory elements that may be the site of mutations responsible for some cases of MPHD.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenomicsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCells, CulturedConserved SequenceCricetinaeCricetulusFemaleHomeodomain ProteinsHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMolecular Sequence DataPituitary GlandHomeodomain ProteinsProphet of Pit-1 protein

Identifiers

PMID17557180
PMCPMC1998882
OpenAlexW2137796520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.