ArticleAtencion primaria2007
[Priorities in health promotion according to primary care health professionals: a Delphi study].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training health providers to address unhealthy alcohol use in primary care: a cross-sectional, multicenter study.BMC health services research · 2020Observational
- [Accomplishment of preventive activities proposed by resident doctors of Family Medicine in Primary Care and its relationship with communication skills].Atencion primaria · 2019Article
- [Attitudes of physicians and nurses towards health prevention and promotion activities in Primary Care].Atencion primaria · 2014Observational
- [Design and validation of a questionnaire on attitudes to prevention and health promotion in primary care (CAPPAP)].Atencion primaria · 2013Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo find out the opinions of primary care professionals on prevention activities in clinical practice, as well as the perceived obstacles to carrying them out and ways of overcoming them.
participantsA total of 129 professionals participated, including primary care doctors, nurses, technicians, primary care service managers, and public health professionals.
designDelphi questionnaire sent by e-mail.
settingPrimary care in Catalonia, Spain. MAIN MEASUREMENTS AND
resultsTwo rounds were made with response rates of 48.9% and 67.4%, respectively. Convergence of over 40% was obtained in all the questions after the second round. The main problems for prevention in clinical practice were lack of time, lack of training and the attitudes of the professionals themselves towards prevention. To improve implementing prevention in the practice, the professionals pointed out, training in communication skills, advice methodology and the use of clinical practice guidelines.
conclusionsHealth professionals pointed out some specific needs in training which could help to improve the inclusion of prevention activities. On the other hand, it was noted that the attitudes of the professionals themselves towards prevention need to be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.