Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17555561›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2007

Molecular response to aromatase inhibitor treatment in primary breast cancer.

Alan Mackay, Ander Urruticoechea, J Michael Dixon, Tim Dexter, Kerry Fenwick, Alan Ashworth, Suzanne Drury, Alexey Larionov, Oliver Young, Sharon White and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Case report: 16-yr life history and genomic evolution of an ERCold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neoadjuvant Trials in ERCancer discovery · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Alan MackayThe Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JB, UK. alan.mackay@icr.ac.uk
Ander Urruticoechea
J Michael Dixon
Tim Dexter
Kerry Fenwick
Alan Ashworth
Suzanne Drury
Alexey Larionov
Oliver Young
Sharon White
William R Miller
Dean B Evans
Mitch Dowsett
Western General Hospital · GBBreast Cancer Now · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBNovartis (Switzerland) · CHRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Breast Cancer Now BREAST CANCER NOW RESEARCH CENTRE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAromatase inhibitors such as anastrozole and letrozole are highly effective suppressants of estrogen synthesis in postmenopausal women and are the most effective endocrine treatments for hormone receptor positive breast cancer in such women. Little is known of the molecular effects of these agents on human breast carcinomas in vivo.

methodsWe randomly assigned primary estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients to treatment with anastrozole or letrozole for 2 weeks before surgery. Expression profiling using cDNA arrays was conducted on pretreatment and post-treatment biopsies. Sample pairs from 34 patients provided sufficient RNA for analysis.

resultsProfound changes in gene expression were seen with both aromatase inhibitors, including many classical estrogen-dependent genes such as TFF1, CCND1, PDZK1 and AGR2, but also many other genes that are likely to represent secondary responses; decrease in the expression of proliferation-related genes were particularly prominent. Many upregulated genes are involved in extracellular matrix remodelling, including collagens and members of the small leucine-rich proteoglycan family (LUM, DCN, and ASPN). No significant differences were seen between letrozole and anastrozole in terms of molecular effects. The gene changes were integrated into a Global Index of Dependence on Estrogen (GIDE), which enumerates the genes changing by at least twofold with therapy. The GIDE varied markedly between tumours and related significantly to pretreatment levels of HER2 and changes in immunohistochemically detected Ki67.

conclusionOur findings identify the transcriptional signatures associated with aromatase inhibitor treatment of primary breast tumours. Larger datasets using this approach should enable identification of estrogen-dependent molecular changes, which are the determinants of benefit or resistance to endocrine therapy.

Indexed as

AnastrozoleAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLetrozoleNitrilesPolymerase Chain ReactionPostmenopauseReceptors, EstrogenTriazolesUp-RegulationAnastrozoleAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsLetrozoleNitrilesReceptors, EstrogenTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID17555561
PMCPMC1929101
OpenAlexW2165241692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.