Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17554250›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2008

Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler (NutriSTEP): validation and test-retest reliability of a parent-administered questionnaire assessing nutrition risk of preschoolers.

J A Randall Simpson, H H Keller, L A Rysdale, J E Beyers

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02375490 (A Multilevel Intervention to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Healthy Eating Among Young Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02375490 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

A Multilevel Intervention to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Healthy Eating Among Young Children (Ages 3-5) Attending Early Childcare Centres: the Healthy Start Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité de SherbrookeRan2013 to 2016Enrolled897ConditionsPediatric ObesityArmsHealthy Start
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J A Randall SimpsonDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada. rjanis@uoguelph.ca
H H Keller
L A Rysdale
J E Beyers
University of Guelph · CAUniversity of Sudbury · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesStudy 1: To establish the validity of scores on Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler (NutriSTEP), a community-based parent-administered screening tool for assessing nutrition risk, by comparing scores to an expert rating. Study 2: To demonstrate test-retest reliability of NutriSTEP. SUBJECTS/

methodsStudy 1: Parents of 269 preschoolers (of 294 parents recruited from the community), completed the NutriSTEP questionnaire; a registered dietitian (RD) assessed the nutritional status (based on medical and nutritional history, 3 days of dietary recall and anthropometric measurements) of these preschoolers and rated their nutritional risk (1 (low) to 10 (high risk)). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to establish validity and determine appropriate cut points based on sensitivity and specificity. Study 2: Parents of 140 preschoolers (of 161 recruited) completed NutriSTEP on two occasions. Intraclass correlation (ICC) and kappa were used to assess reliability.

resultsStudy 1: Scores on NutriSTEP and the RD rating were correlated (r=0.48, P=0.01). Area under the ROC curve for the high risk RD rating (score 8+) and the moderate risk rating (score 5+) were 81.5 and 73.8%, respectively. A moderate risk cut point of >20 and high risk cut point of >25 were identified for the NutriSTEP scores. Study 2: The NutriSTEP score was reliable between administrations (ICC=0.89, F=16.7, P<0.001). Most items on the questionnaire had adequate (kappa>0.5) or excellent (kappa>0.75) agreement.

conclusionsThe NutriSTEP questionnaire is both valid and reliable for determining nutritional risk in preschoolers.

Indexed as

Child Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutrition AssessmentAnthropometryChild Nutrition DisordersChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMental RecallNutritional StatusReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID17554250
OpenAlexW2038081469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.