ArticleDNA repair2007
X-rays induce distinct patterns of somatic mutation in fetal versus adult hematopoietic cells.
Article in DNA repair, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure.Life sciences in space research · 2016Review
- Involvement of DNA polymerase β overexpression in the malignant transformation induced by benzo[a]pyrene.Toxicology · 2013Article
- Ionizing radiation is a potent inducer of mitotic recombination in mouse embryonic stem cells.Mutation research · 2011Article
- Article
- The bright and the dark sides of DNA repair in stem cells.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2010Review
- Mutagenesis in vivo in T cells of p21-deficient mice.Mutation research · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There are a variety of mechanisms and pathways whereby cells safeguard their genomes in the face of environmental insults that damage DNA. Whether each of these pathways is equally robust at specific developmental stages in mammals and whether they are also modulated in a tissue-specific manner, however, are unclear. Here, we report that ionizing radiation (IR) produces different types of somatic mutations in fetal cells compared with adult cells of the same lineage. While 1 Gy of X-ray significantly induced intragenic point mutations in T cells of adult mice, no point mutational effect was observed when applied to fetuses. Fetal exposure to IR, on the other hand, led to a significant elevation of mitotic recombination in T cells, which was not observed in adults. Base excision repair (BER) activity was significantly lower in fetal hematopoietic cells than in adult cells, due to a low level of DNA polymerase beta, the rate-limiting enzyme in BER. In fetal hematopoietic cells, this low BER activity, together with a high rate of proliferation, causes X-ray-induced DNA lesions, such as base damage, single strand breaks and double strand breaks, to be repaired by homologous recombination, which we observe as mitotic recombination. Higher BER activity and a relatively lower rate of cell proliferation likely contribute to the significant induction of DNA point mutations in adults. Thus, the mutational response to IR is at least partly determined by the availability of specific repair pathways and other developmentally regulated phenotypes, such as mitotic index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.