Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17553157›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2007

Improving model predictions for RNA interference activities that use support vector machine regression by combining and filtering features.

Andrew S Peek

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. siRNA Design and GalNAc-Empowered Hepatic Targeted Delivery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. A review on current status of antiviral siRNA.Reviews in medical virology · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Computational design of artificial RNA molecules for gene regulation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Progress toward in vivo use of siRNAs-II.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2012
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Modeling recursive RNA interference.PLoS computational biology · 2008
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrew S PeekDepartment of Bioinformatics, Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc., Coralville, IA 52241, USA. apeek@idtdna.com

Funding

Support Vector Machine modeling software for improving RNAi efficacy predictionR43GM079132 · NIGMS · INTEGRATED DNA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · PI PEEK, ANDREW S. · 2006 to 2006
$98k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R43GM079132-01NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM079132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRNA interference (RNAi) is a naturally occurring phenomenon that results in the suppression of a target RNA sequence utilizing a variety of possible methods and pathways. To dissect the factors that result in effective siRNA sequences a regression kernel Support Vector Machine (SVM) approach was used to quantitatively model RNA interference activities.

resultsEight overall feature mapping methods were compared in their abilities to build SVM regression models that predict published siRNA activities. The primary factors in predictive SVM models are position specific nucleotide compositions. The secondary factors are position independent sequence motifs (N-grams) and guide strand to passenger strand sequence thermodynamics. Finally, the factors that are least contributory but are still predictive of efficacy are measures of intramolecular guide strand secondary structure and target strand secondary structure. Of these, the site of the 5' most base of the guide strand is the most informative.

conclusionThe capacity of specific feature mapping methods and their ability to build predictive models of RNAi activity suggests a relative biological importance of these features. Some feature mapping methods are more informative in building predictive models and overall t-test filtering provides a method to remove some noisy features or make comparisons among datasets. Together, these features can yield predictive SVM regression models with increased predictive accuracy between predicted and observed activities both within datasets by cross validation, and between independently collected RNAi activity datasets. Feature filtering to remove features should be approached carefully in that it is possible to reduce feature set size without substantially reducing predictive models, but the features retained in the candidate models become increasingly distinct. Software to perform feature prediction and SVM training and testing on nucleic acid sequences can be found at the following site: ftp://scitoolsftp.idtdna.com/SEQ2SVM/.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, GeneticBase SequenceComputer SimulationModels, ChemicalModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataRegression AnalysisRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, RNARNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID17553157
PMCPMC1906837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.