Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17551090›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia bulletin2007

The genetic deconstruction of psychosis.

Michael J Owen, Nick Craddock, Assen Jablensky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Psychotic Disorders in Epilepsy: Do They Differ from Primary Psychosis?Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. NeuroImage. Clinical · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Examining cognition across the bipolar/schizophrenia diagnostic spectrum.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael J OwenDepartment of Psychological Medicine, The School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. owenmj@cardiff.ac.uk
Nick Craddock
Assen Jablensky

Funding

Medical Research Council G9810900Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychiatric research, including the search for predisposing genes, has tended to proceed under the assumptions that schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, as defined in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, and International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, are discrete disease entities with distinct etiology and pathogenesis and that these disease entities can be identified by current "operational" diagnostic conventions. However, recent findings emerging from genetic studies show increasing evidence for an overlap in genetic susceptibility across the traditional binary classification of psychosis. Moreover, the emerging evidence suggests the possibility of relatively specific relationships between genotype and psychopathology. For example, variation in Disrupted in Schizophrenia 1 (DISC1) and Neuregulin 1 (NRG1) may confer susceptibility to a form of illness with mixed features of schizophrenia and mania. The elucidation of genotype-phenotype relationships is at an early stage, but current findings highlight the need to consider alternative approaches to classification and conceptualization for psychiatric research rather than continuing to rely heavily on the traditional categorical approach. We can expect that, over the coming years, molecular genetics will catalyze a reappraisal of psychiatric nosology as well as contribute in a major way to our understanding of pathophysiology and to the development of improved treatments. However, our understanding of the brain mechanisms that link specific gene actions and products to the subjective experience of psychopathological symptoms is likely to be bridged by employing intermediate (or endo-) phenotypes in the domains such as cognition, neurophysiology, or neuroanatomy rather than relying upon clinical measures alone.

Indexed as

Carrier ProteinsCatechol O-MethyltransferaseChromosomes, Human, Pair 13Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersDysbindinDystrophin-Associated ProteinsGene ExpressionGenetic LinkageGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuregulin-1Psychotic DisordersSchizophreniaTwinsCarrier ProteinsCatechol O-MethyltransferaseDAOA protein, humanDISC1 protein, humanDTNBP1 protein, humanDysbindinDystrophin-Associated ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuregulin-1NRG1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID17551090
PMCPMC2632314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.