Diabetes care and the new GMS contract: the evidence for a whole county.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

1. Implementation strategies to increase smoking cessation treatment provision in primary care: a systematic review of observational studies.BMC primary care · 2023
   Pooled it
2. Effectiveness of UK provider financial incentives on quality of care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
   Pooled it
3. The equity dimension in evaluations of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2011
   Pooled it
4. Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.BMC health services research · 2010
   Pooled it
5. History Bias, Study Design, and the Unfulfilled Promise of Pay-for-Performance Policies in Health Care.Preventing chronic disease · 2016
   Article
6. Financial Incentives and Inequalities in Smoking Cessation Interventions in Primary Care: Before-and-After Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
   Article
7. Is a diabetes pay-for-performance program cost-effective under the National Health Insurance in Taiwan?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2014
   Observational
8. Diabetes care: reasons for missing HbA1c measurements in general practice.BMC research notes · 2011
   Article
9. The effects of pay for performance on disparities in stroke, hypertension, and coronary heart disease management: interrupted time series study.PloS one · 2011
   Article
10. Effectiveness of the introduction of a Chronic Care Model-based program for type 2 diabetes in Belgium.BMC health services research · 2010
    Article
11. Do the Quality and Outcomes Framework patient experience indicators reward practices that offer improved access?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
12. Effect of the quality and outcomes framework on diabetes care in the United Kingdom: retrospective cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2009
    Article
13. Population intermediate outcomes of diabetes under pay-for-performance incentives in England from 2004 to 2008.Diabetes care · 2009
    Article
14. Impact of practice size on delivery of diabetes care before and after the Quality and Outcomes Framework implementation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
15. Mangin on QOF.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
16. The experience of pay for performance in English family practice: a qualitative study.Annals of family medicine
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as