Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17550599›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2007

Large-scale analysis of transcriptional cis-regulatory modules reveals both common features and distinct subclasses.

Long Li, Qianqian Zhu, Xin He, Saurabh Sinha, Marc S Halfon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. GAMI-CRM: Using de novo motif inference to detect cis-regulatory modules.Proceedings of the ... Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Congress on Evolutionary Computation · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Long LiDepartment of Biochemistry, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Qianqian Zhu
Xin He
Saurabh Sinha
Marc S Halfon
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Computational Approaches to Disease Causes and TreatmentP20GM067650 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI ZHANG, AIDONG · 2003 to 2005
$1.2M
Computational and Functional Analysis of Gene NetworksK22HG002489 · NHGRI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI HALFON, MARC S · 2002 to 2006
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS K22 HG002489NHGRI NIH HHS K22-HG002489NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM067650NIGMS NIH HHS P20-GM67650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscriptional cis-regulatory modules (for example, enhancers) play a critical role in regulating gene expression. While many individual regulatory elements have been characterized, they have never been analyzed as a class.

resultsWe have performed the first such large-scale study of cis-regulatory modules in order to determine whether they have common properties that might aid in their identification and contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms by which they function. A total of 280 individual, experimentally verified cis-regulatory modules from Drosophila were analyzed for a range of sequence-level and functional properties. We report here that regulatory modules do indeed share common properties, among them an elevated GC content, an increased level of interspecific sequence conservation, and a tendency to be transcribed into RNA. However, we find that dense clustering of transcription factor binding sites, especially homotypic clustering, which is commonly believed to be a general characteristic of regulatory modules, is rather a feature that belongs chiefly to a specific subclass. This has important implications for current computational approaches, many of which are biased toward this subset. We explore two new strategies to assess binding site clustering and gauge their performances with respect to their ability to detect all 280 modules and various functionally coherent subsets.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate that cis-regulatory modules share common features that help to define them as a class and that may lead to new insights into mechanisms of gene regulation. However, these properties alone may not be sufficient to reliably distinguish regulatory from non-regulatory sequences. We also demonstrate that there are distinct subclasses of cis-regulatory modules that are more amenable to in silico detection than others and that these differences must be taken into account when attempting genome-wide regulatory element discovery.

Indexed as

Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidTranscription, GeneticAnimalsBase SequenceConserved SequenceDatabases, Nucleic AcidDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterGenes, Insect

Identifiers

PMID17550599
PMCPMC2394749
OpenAlexW2125427437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.