ArticleGenome biology2007
Large-scale analysis of transcriptional cis-regulatory modules reveals both common features and distinct subclasses.
Article in Genome biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- A transcription factor ensemble orchestrates bundle sheath expression in rice.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Problems with Paralogs: The Promise and Challenges of Gene Duplicates in Evo-Devo Research.Integrative and comparative biology · 2024Review
- Transcription factor interactions explain the context-dependent activity of CRX binding sites.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Review
- Genome-wide oscillations in G + C density and sequence conservation.Genome research · 2021Article
- Annotating the Insect Regulatory Genome.Insects · 2021Review
- Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Review
- Article
- Studying Transcriptional Enhancers: The Founder Fallacy, Validation Creep, and Other Biases.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2019Review
- REDfly: the transcriptional regulatory element database for Drosophila.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Beyond the Exome: The Non-coding Genome and Enhancers in Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Malformations of Cortical Development.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019Article
- Enhancer identification and activity evaluation in the red flour beetle,Development (Cambridge, England) · 2018Article
- An Enhancer's Length and Composition Are Shaped by Its Regulatory Task.Frontiers in genetics · 2017Article
- Spatial distribution of predicted transcription factor binding sites in Drosophila ChIP peaks.Mechanisms of development · 2016Article
- Structural Insights into the Assembly of the Adeno-associated Virus Type 2 Rep68 Protein on the Integration Site AAVS1.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2015Article
- Article
- GAMI-CRM: Using de novo motif inference to detect cis-regulatory modules.Proceedings of the ... Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Congress on Evolutionary Computation · 2014Article
- Identification of cis-regulatory modules encoding temporal dynamics during development.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Microsatellite repeat instability fuels evolution of embryonic enhancers in Hawaiian Drosophila.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTranscriptional cis-regulatory modules (for example, enhancers) play a critical role in regulating gene expression. While many individual regulatory elements have been characterized, they have never been analyzed as a class.
resultsWe have performed the first such large-scale study of cis-regulatory modules in order to determine whether they have common properties that might aid in their identification and contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms by which they function. A total of 280 individual, experimentally verified cis-regulatory modules from Drosophila were analyzed for a range of sequence-level and functional properties. We report here that regulatory modules do indeed share common properties, among them an elevated GC content, an increased level of interspecific sequence conservation, and a tendency to be transcribed into RNA. However, we find that dense clustering of transcription factor binding sites, especially homotypic clustering, which is commonly believed to be a general characteristic of regulatory modules, is rather a feature that belongs chiefly to a specific subclass. This has important implications for current computational approaches, many of which are biased toward this subset. We explore two new strategies to assess binding site clustering and gauge their performances with respect to their ability to detect all 280 modules and various functionally coherent subsets.
conclusionOur findings demonstrate that cis-regulatory modules share common features that help to define them as a class and that may lead to new insights into mechanisms of gene regulation. However, these properties alone may not be sufficient to reliably distinguish regulatory from non-regulatory sequences. We also demonstrate that there are distinct subclasses of cis-regulatory modules that are more amenable to in silico detection than others and that these differences must be taken into account when attempting genome-wide regulatory element discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.