Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17550598›Full record

Trial reportRespiratory research2007

Azithromycin in the extremely low birth weight infant for the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a pilot study.

Hubert O Ballard, Michael I Anstead, Lori A Shook

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Respiratory research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Azithromycin for eradication ofArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials for the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2014
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. [Advances in clinical pharmacotherapy for neonatalZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Clinical characteristics ofZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  19. PlacingChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Azithromycin for Eradication ofThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hubert O BallardPediatrics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. hoball2@uky.edu
Michael I Anstead
Lori A Shook
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAzithromycin reduces the severity of illness in patients with inflammatory lung disease such as cystic fibrosis and diffuse panbronchiolitis. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a pulmonary disorder which causes significant morbidity and mortality in premature infants. BPD is pathologically characterized by inflammation, fibrosis and impaired alveolar development. The purpose of this study was to obtain pilot data on the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic azithromycin in reducing the incidence and severity of BPD in an extremely low birth weight (< or = 1000 grams) population.

methodsInfants < or = 1000 g birth weight admitted to the University of Kentucky Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (level III, regional referral center) from 9/1/02-6/30/03 were eligible for this pilot study. The pilot study was double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled. Infants were randomized to treatment or placebo within 12 hours of beginning mechanical ventilation (IMV) and within 72 hours of birth. The treatment group received azithromycin 10 mg/kg/day for 7 days followed by 5 mg/kg/day for the duration of the study. Azithromycin or placebo was continued until the infant no longer required IMV or supplemental oxygen, to a maximum of 6 weeks. Primary endpoints were incidence of BPD as defined by oxygen requirement at 36 weeks gestation, post-natal steroid use, days of IMV, and mortality. Data was analyzed by intention to treat using Chi-square and ANOVA.

resultsA total of 43 extremely premature infants were enrolled in this pilot study. Mean gestational age and birth weight were similar between groups. Mortality, incidence of BPD, days of IMV, and other morbidities were not significantly different between groups. Post-natal steroid use was significantly less in the treatment group [31% (6/19)] vs. placebo group [62% (10/16)] (p = 0.05). Duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly less in treatment survivors, with a median of 13 days (1-47 days) vs. 35 days (1-112 days)(p = 0.02).

conclusionOur study suggests that azithromycin prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight infants may effectively reduce post-natal steroid use for infants. Further studies are needed to assess the effects of azithromycin on the incidence of BPD and possible less common side effects, before any recommendations regarding routine clinical use can be made.

Indexed as

Infant, Extremely Low Birth WeightAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAzithromycinBronchopulmonary DysplasiaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePilot ProjectsPlacebo EffectTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAzithromycin

Identifiers

PMID17550598
PMCPMC1896160
OpenAlexW2123968840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.