Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17549458›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2007

De-escalation therapy rates are significantly higher by bronchoalveolar lavage than by tracheal aspirate.

Elpis Giantsou, Nikolaos Liratzopoulos, Eleni Efraimidou, Maria Panopoulou, Eleonora Alepopoulou, Sofia Kartali-Ktenidou, Konstantinos Manolas

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Simplified Spectrum Score (SScientific reports · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as de-escalation in ventilator-associated pneumonia: a cohort study subanalysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Physician Responsiveness to Positive Blood Culture Results at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Hospital-Is Anyone Paying Attention?Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elpis GiantsouDemokritus University of Thrace, Intensive Care Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical School, University Campus, 68100 Alexandropolis, Greece. elpisgiantsou@yahoo.com
Nikolaos Liratzopoulos
Eleni Efraimidou
Maria Panopoulou
Eleonora Alepopoulou
Sofia Kartali-Ktenidou
Konstantinos Manolas
Democritus University of Thrace · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess outcomes with de-escalation therapy in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

designProspective observational study.

settingMultidisciplinary intensive care unit. PATIENTS AND

participantsVAP was diagnosed by positive quantitative cultures of both tracheal aspirate and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and treated appropriately for all significant isolates of tracheal aspirate and BAL in 143 patients who were assigned to de-escalation therapy by BAL or tracheal aspirate.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsAntibiotic therapy was de-escalated in 58 patients (40.5%), who had decreased mortality at day 15 (5.1% vs. 31.7%) and day 28 (12% vs. 43.5%) and shorter intensive care unit (17.2 +/- 1.2 vs. 22.7 +/- 6.3 days) and hospital (23.7 +/- 2.8 vs. 29.8 +/- 11.1 days) stay (p < 0.05). Of the 81 patients assigned to tracheal aspirate, the 17 (21%) who achieved de-escalation of therapy had reduced 15-day mortality (5.8% vs. 34.3%), reduced 28-day mortality (11.6% vs. 45.3%), and shorter intensive care unit (17.2 +/- 1.6 vs. 22.4 +/- 6.4 days) and hospital (23.1 +/- 4.4 vs. 29.9 +/- 11.1 days) stay (p < 0.05). Of the 62 patients assigned to BAL, the 41 (66.1%) who achieved de-escalation of therapy had decreased 15-day mortality (4.8% vs. 23.8%), decreased 28-day mortality (12.1% vs. 38%), and shorter intensive care unit (17.2 +/- 1.1 vs. 23.2 +/- 6 days) and hospital (23.8 +/- 2.4 vs. 29.8 +/- 11.4 days) stay (p < 0.05).

conclusionsFor patients with VAP who have had appropriate treatment and shown a favorable clinical response, mortality and duration of stay can be further improved by de-escalation therapy.

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCritical CareFemaleGreeceHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedProspective StudiesTracheaAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID17549458
PMCPMC7095354
OpenAlexW2082951596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.