Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17548853›Full record

ReviewAnnals of family medicine

Improving medical practice: a conceptual framework.

Leif I Solberg

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01615237 nacompletednot on this map

Implementing Tobacco Use Treatment Guidelines in Dental Public Health Clinics

TypeinterventionalSponsorNYU Langone HealthRan2013 to 2018Enrolled3,207ConditionsTobacco Use TreatmentArmsAudit and performance feedback (PF), Financial Incentive (P4P), Current Best Practices (CBP)
NCT03000751 nacompletednot on this map

CT Dose Optimization and Standardization Endeavor (DOSE) Collaboratory

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2016 to 2020Enrolled864,080ConditionsIonizing Radiation Exposure, Quality ImprovementArmsSimple Audit Report, Multi-Component Intervention, In-Person Meeting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Improving the Adoption of Advance Directives in Primary Care Practices.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An Assessment of Weight Loss Management in Health System Primary Care Practices.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Strategies for Dose Optimization: Views From Health Care Systems.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2022
    Article
  19. Healthcare Quality Improvement: The Need for a Macro-Systems Approach.Annual IEEE Systems Conference. IEEE Systems Conference · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Leif I SolbergHealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minn 55440, USA. leif.i.solberg@healthpartners.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this article is to produce a relatively simple conceptual framework for guiding and studying practice improvement.

methodsI summarize the lessons from my experience with a variety of quality improvement research studies during the last 30 years, supplemented with relevant literature from both medicine and other industries about the issues associated with successful quality improvement.

resultsMy experience suggests that organizational leadership with an urgent vision for change, ability to manage the change process, and selection of systematic changes capable of fulfilling the vision are each critical for successful quality improvement. Published literature from other industries emphasizes the importance of a goal-directed change process managed by leaders who recognize the need to engage their employees and other leaders in a disciplined but flexible way that accommodates external and internal factors and uses teams and group learning. It also suggests the importance of organizational context and the level of external and internal barriers and facilitators for change. The resulting model proposes that priority, change process, and care process content are necessary for measurable improvements in quality of care and patient outcomes, although internal and external barriers must also be attended to and addressed.

conclusionThis framework may provide a guide to those in the front lines of care who would like to make the care transformations that are needed to greatly improve care. It may also be helpful to those who are developing or testing interventions and recruiting medical practices for such change efforts.

Indexed as

Health PrioritiesHumansOrganizational InnovationProcess Assessment, Health CareQuality Assurance, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID17548853
PMCPMC1886486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.