Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17548210›Full record

ReviewSeminars in immunology2007

A role for "self" in T-cell activation.

Michelle Krogsgaard, Jeremy Juang, Mark M Davis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in immunology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Tetraspanin-5-mediated MHC class I clustering is required for optimal CD8 T cell activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Coreceptors and TCR Signaling - the Strong and the Weak of It.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. CART cells are prone to Fas- and DR5-mediated cell death.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Engineering CAR-T cells: Design concepts.Trends in immunology · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Phenotypic models of T cell activation.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2014
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle KrogsgaardDepartment of Pathology and NYU Cancer Institute, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA. michelle.krogsgaard@med.nyu.edu
Jeremy Juang
Mark M Davis

Funding

T CELL RECEPTOR STRUCTURE AND EXPRESSIONR01AI022511 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, MARK MORRIS · 1985 to 2014
$3.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI022511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms by which alphabeta T-cells are selected in the thymus and then recognize peptide MHC (pMHC) complexes in the periphery remain an enigma. Recent work particularly with respect to quantification of T-cell sensitivity and the role of self-ligands in T-cell activation has provided some important clues to the details of how TCR signaling might be initiated. Here, we highlight recent experimental data that provides insights into the initiation of T-cell activation and also discuss the main controversies and uncertainties in this area.

Indexed as

Antigen-Presenting CellsCD8 AntigensHumansLymph NodesLymphocyte ActivationPeptidesSpleenThymus GlandT-LymphocytesCD8 AntigensPeptides

Identifiers

PMID17548210
PMCPMC2731063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.