ArticleCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2007
Microscopic colitis.
Article in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microscopic colitis and reproductive factors related to exposure to estrogens and progesterone.Drug target insights · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the diagnosis of microscopic colitis (MC) is made on the basis of histologic criteria, it is crucial to render an accurate microscopic interpretation. Features include 20 or more lymphocytes per 100 epithelial cells, mixed lamina propria inflammatory infiltrate, and preservation of crypt architecture for both lymphocytic and collagenous colitis (CC). CC is further characterized by a collagen band at least 10 mum thick. Although the pathogenesis of MC is poorly understood, medication-induced toxicity to the colonic mucosa is important to recognize, as medication cessation leads to prompt improvement. If MC is mild, symptomatic treatment is all that is needed, because some cases are self-limiting. Budesonide, 9 mg daily for at least 8 weeks, is the best documented treatment of choice for more severe or protracted cases. A 75% response rate has been reported; however, when treatment is discontinued, relapse is common, and longer-term tapering dose therapy often is necessary. There are disadvantages and no advantage to other forms of steroid therapy. Cholestyramine, bismuth, and 5-aminosalicylate derivatives appear to be less efficacious but are reasonable therapeutic options for less severe cases. Use of immunosuppressant therapy such as azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine should be highly restricted because MC is a benign condition that does not result in other complications. Probiotic therapy with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis has not been shown to be effective in reducing bowel frequency. Surgical diversion of the fecal stream can control diarrhea and improve histology but is very rarely indicated and should be reserved for highly selected cases of severely symptomatic steroid-refractory MC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.