ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2007
Levalbuterol for asthma: a better treatment?
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corticosteroids in the treatment of acute asthma.Annals of thoracic medicine · 2014Review
- The patient with asthma in the emergency department.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2012Review
- Asthma Exacerbations: Pathogenesis, Prevention, and Treatment.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practiceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to determine whether the proinflammatory actions identified in vitro for (S)-albuterol provide a clinically significant therapeutic advantage for levalbuterol over racemic albuterol. Clinical trials evaluating the bronchodilation in chronic and acute asthma provide conflicting evidence. Older trials suggested an advantage for levalbuterol; however, the newer trials have failed to confirm those advantages. Although (S)-albuterol produces increased bronchial hyperresponsiveness in vitro and in animal models, this has not been consistently confirmed in clinical trials; however, the heterogeneity of the trials precludes definitive conclusions. Current clinical trials do not provide evidence of a substantial advantage of levalbuterol over racemic albuterol although the data are insufficient to determine whether subsets of the patient population might benefit from single isomer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.