Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17547825›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2007

Should antiretroviral therapy be started earlier?

Joel E Gallant

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Efavirenz: a decade of clinical experience in the treatment of HIV.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joel E GallantDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 East Monument Street, Room 443, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. jgallant@jhmi.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current treatment guidelines recommend that antiretroviral therapy be deferred until the CD4 count has fallen into the 200 to 350 cells/mm(3) range. However, treatment has become simpler, less toxic, and more forgiving of missed doses. Longer-term follow-up data from clinical cohorts are now showing better outcomes when therapy is started at higher CD4 cell counts. Therapy initiated early has better virologic and immunologic responses, is better tolerated, and is cost-effective. Recent developments and clinical data support a return to earlier initiation of therapy.

Indexed as

Anti-Retroviral AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCD4 Lymphocyte CountHepatitisHIV InfectionsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTimeAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.