ArticleBMC systems biology2007
Understanding network concepts in modules.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 205 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
205 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Meta-Analysis of Tumor Stem-Like Breast Cancer Cells Using Gene Set and Network Analysis.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Network-based SNP meta-analysis identifies joint and disjoint genetic features across common human diseases.BMC genomics · 2012Pooled it
- Effects of psychological stress on innate immunity and metabolism in humans: a systematic analysis.PloS one · 2012Pooled it
- A cross-species transcriptomics approach to identify genes involved in leaf development.BMC genomics · 2008Pooled it
- Trial
- Dynamic tracking of functional gene modules in treated juvenile idiopathic arthritis.Genome medicine · 2015Trial
- Modulation of epidermal transcription circuits in psoriasis: new links between inflammation and hyperproliferation.PloS one · 2013Trial
- Article
- A spatially informed matrix normal model for gene co-expression analysis in spatial transcriptomics studies.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Library size-stabilized metacells construction enhances co-expression network analysis in single-cell data.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Human iPSC-derived glutamatergic neurons with pathogenic KCNQ2 variants display hyperactive bursting phenotypes.Neurobiology of disease · 2025Article
- Short-Term Maize Rotation Suppresses Verticillium Wilt and Restructures Soil Microbiomes in Xinjiang Cotton Fields.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Estimating metabolite networks subject to dietary preferences and lifestyle.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2025Article
- Mapping Molecular Pathways of Multiple Sclerosis: A Gene Prioritization and Network Analysis of White Matter Pathology Transcriptomics.Annals of neurology · 2025Article
- Utilizing cohort-level and individual networks to predict best response in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Integrative multi-transcriptomic analysis uncovers core genes and potential defense mechanisms in rice-Magnoporthe oryzae interaction.Plant cell reports · 2025Article
- Unsupervised multiscale clustering of single-cell transcriptomes to identify hierarchical structures of cell subtypes.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Absolute abundance unveils Basidiobolus as a cross-domain bridge indirectly bolstering gut microbiome homeostasis.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- WGCNA-based analysis ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Article
145 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNetwork concepts are increasingly used in biology and genetics. For example, the clustering coefficient has been used to understand network architecture; the connectivity (also known as degree) has been used to screen for cancer targets; and the topological overlap matrix has been used to define modules and to annotate genes. Dozens of potentially useful network concepts are known from graph theory.
resultsHere we study network concepts in special types of networks, which we refer to as approximately factorizable networks. In these networks, the pairwise connection strength (adjacency) between 2 network nodes can be factored into node specific contributions, named node 'conformity'. The node conformity turns out to be highly related to the connectivity. To provide a formalism for relating network concepts to each other, we define three types of network concepts: fundamental-, conformity-based-, and approximate conformity-based concepts. Fundamental concepts include the standard definitions of connectivity, density, centralization, heterogeneity, clustering coefficient, and topological overlap. The approximate conformity-based analogs of fundamental network concepts have several theoretical advantages. First, they allow one to derive simple relationships between seemingly disparate networks concepts. For example, we derive simple relationships between the clustering coefficient, the heterogeneity, the density, the centralization, and the topological overlap. The second advantage of approximate conformity-based network concepts is that they allow one to show that fundamental network concepts can be approximated by simple functions of the connectivity in module networks.
conclusionUsing protein-protein interaction, gene co-expression, and simulated data, we show that a) many networks comprised of module nodes are approximately factorizable and b) in these types of networks, simple relationships exist between seemingly disparate network concepts. Our results are implemented in freely available R software code, which can be downloaded from the following webpage: http://www.genetics.ucla.edu/labs/horvath/ModuleConformity/ModuleNetworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.