Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17543535›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2007

Factors that impact the vacuum ultraviolet photofragmentation of peptide ions.

Matthew S Thompson, Weidong Cui, James P Reilly

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Investigating the Efficiency of Ultraviolet Photodissociation in Peptides Modified withJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026
    Article
  2. Photolysis of the peptide bond at 193 and 222 nm.The Journal of chemical physics · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. VUV Photodissociation Induced by a Deuterium Lamp in an Ion Trap.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The Mechanism Behind Top-Down UVPD Experiments: Making Sense of Apparent Contradictions.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Shedding light on the frontier of photodissociation.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew S ThompsonDepartment of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405-4001, USA.
Weidong Cui
James P Reilly

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several groups have investigated the photodissociation of peptide ions with ultraviolet light. Significant differences have been reported with 157 and 193 nm excitation. Recent studies have shown that the mass analyzer can also influence the observed photofragment distribution. Comparison of experiments using different peptides, wavelengths, and mass analyzers is undesirably complicated. In the present work, several peptides are analyzed with both 157 and 193 nm photodissociation in tandem-TOF and linear ion trap mass spectrometers. The results indicate that the fragment ion distribution can be influenced by both the photodissociation wavelength and the mass analyzer. The two wavelengths generate similar spectra in an ion trap but quite different results in a tandem-TOF instrument.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceElectrochemistryPeptide MappingPeptidesPhotochemistrySpectrophotometry, UltravioletVacuumPeptides

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.