ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2007
Patient and provider perceptions of hypertension treatment: do they agree?
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00265538 (Implementing Evidence-based Treatment of Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementing Evidence-based Treatment of Hypertension
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- "All the money in the world …" patient perspectives regarding the influence of financial incentives.Health services research · 2011Trial
- "Hypertension is such a difficult disease to manage": federally qualified health center staff- and leadership-perceived readiness to implement a technology-facilitated team-based hypertension model.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Beta-Blockers and Cancer: Where Are We?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Perceptions of quality in primary health care: perspectives of patients and professionals based on focus group discussions.BMC family practice · 2014Article
- Understanding minority patients' beliefs about hypertension to reduce gaps in communication between patients and clinicians.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2012Article
- Distance is relative: unpacking a principal barrier in rural healthcare.Journal of general internal medicine · 2011Article
- The role of Beta-blockers as first-line therapy in hypertension.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2011Review
- Part II, provider perspectives: should patients be activated to request evidence-based medicine? A qualitative study of the VA project to implement diuretics (VAPID).Implementation science : IS · 2010Article
- Part I, patient perspective: activating patients to engage their providers in the use of evidence-based medicine: a qualitative evaluation of the VA Project to Implement Diuretics (VAPID).Implementation science : IS · 2010Article
- Beta-blockers: no longer an option for uncomplicated hypertension.Current cardiology reports · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of our study was to explore physician and patient attitudes regarding hypertension management. One hundred forty-five primary care providers and 189 patients with hypertension at 6 Veterans Administration clinics completed a hypertension survey. Fifty-one percent of patients were at their blood pressure goal, 58% were on guideline-concordant therapy, and 31% achieved both. Patients and providers agreed that physicians were a "very/extremely" useful source of information but differed in perceived value of pharmacists, educational material, advertising, and the Internet. They also agreed on the value of preventing cardiovascular events but differed in their perceptions of the importance of medication costs, side effects, and national guidelines. Blood pressure control and guideline-concordant therapy was higher than most prior reports, but with opportunity for improvement. Patients and providers differed in perceived value of various aspects of hypertension management; this information may help to determine trial design and quality improvement strategies in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.