ArticleGenome research2007
A novel view of the transcriptome revealed from gene trapping in mouse embryonic stem cells.
Article in Genome research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Difference Analysis Among Six Kinds of Acceptor Splicing Sequences by the Dispersion Features of 6-mer Subsets in Human Genes.Biology · 2025Article
- Gene trap mutagenesis in the mouse.Methods in enzymology · 2010Article
- Expression-independent gene trap vectors for random and targeted mutagenesis in embryonic stem cells.Nucleic acids research · 2009Article
- Identifying protein-coding genes in genomic sequences.Genome biology · 2009Review
- A genomic analysis of RNA polymerase II modification and chromatin architecture related to 3' end RNA polyadenylation.Genome research · 2008Article
- Efficient targeted transcript discovery via array-based normalization of RACE libraries.Nature methods · 2008Article
- Detailed characterization of the mouse embryonic stem cell transcriptome reveals novel genes and intergenic splicing associated with pluripotency.BMC genomics · 2008Article
- The UniTrap resource: tools for the biologist enabling optimized use of gene trap clones.Nucleic acids research · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Embryonic stem (ES) cells are pluripotent cell lines with the capacity of self-renewal and the ability to differentiate into specific cell types. We performed the first genome-wide analysis of the mouse ES cell transcriptome using approximately 250,000 gene trap sequence tags deposited in public databases. We unveiled >8000 novel transcripts, mostly non-coding, and >1000 novel alternative and often tissue-specific exons of known genes. Experimental verification of the expression of these genes and exons by RT-PCR yielded a 70% validation rate. A novel non-coding transcript within the set studied showed a highly specific pattern of expression by in situ hybridization. Our analysis also shows that the genome presents gene trapping hotspots, which correspond to 383 known and 87 novel genes. These "hypertrapped" genes show minimal overlap with previously published expression profiles of ES cells; however, we prove by real-time PCR that they are highly expressed in this cell type, thus potentially contributing to the phenotype of ES cells. Although gene trapping was initially devised as an insertional mutagenesis technique, our study demonstrates its impact on the discovery of a substantial and unprecedented portion of the transcriptome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.