ArticleMathematical biosciences2007
Statistical properties of ion channel records. Part I: relationship to the macroscopic current.
Article in Mathematical biosciences, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An asymmetric mechanical code ciphers curvature-dependent proprioceptor activity.Science advances · 2021Article
- Conformational changes of an ion-channel during gating and emerging electrophysiologic properties: Application of a computational approach to cardiac Kv7.1.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2016Article
- Superstatistics analysis of the ion current distribution function: Met3PbCl influence study.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2010Article
- Modeling subunit cooperativity in opening of tetrameric ion channels.Biophysical journal · 2008Article
- Statistical properties of ion channel records. Part II: estimation from the macroscopic current.Mathematical biosciences · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Macroscopic ion channel current can be derived by summation of the stochastic records of individual channel currents. In this paper, we present two probability density functions of single channel records that can uniquely determine the macroscopic current regardless of other statistical properties of records or the stochastic model of channel gating (presented often with stationary Markov models). We show that H(t), probability density function of channel opening events (introduced explicitly in this paper), and D(t), probability density function of the open duration (sometimes has named dwell time distribution as well), determine the normalized macroscopic current, G(t), through G(t) = P(t) - H(t) * Q(t) where P(t) is the cumulative density function of H(t), Q(t) is the cumulative density function of D(t), * is the symbol of convolution integral and G(t) is the macroscopic current divided by the amplitude of single channel current and the number of single channel sweeps. Compared to other equations for the macroscopic current, here the macroscopic current is expressed only in terms of the statistical properties of single channel current and not the stochastic model of ion channel gating or a conditioned form of macroscopic current. Single channel currents of an inactivating BK channel were used to validate this relationship experimentally too. In this paper, we used median filters as they can remove the unwanted noise without smoothing the transitions between open and closed states (compare to low pass filters). This filtering leads to more accurate measurement of transition times and less amount of missed events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.