Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17538717›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2007

Cell detection and counting through cell lysate impedance spectroscopy in microfluidic devices.

Xuanhong Cheng, Yi-shao Liu, Daniel Irimia, Utkan Demirci, Liju Yang, Lee Zamir, William R Rodríguez, Mehmet Toner, Rashid Bashir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Detection and Analysis of Human Cells Based on Artificial Neural Network.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Microscopic sensors using optical wireless integrated circuits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Evaporation-induced stimulation of bacterial osmoregulation for electrical assessment of cell viability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xuanhong ChengBioMEMS Resource Center and Center for Engineering in Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Yi-shao Liu
Daniel Irimia
Utkan Demirci
Liju Yang
Lee Zamir
William R Rodríguez
Mehmet Toner
Rashid Bashir
Massachusetts General Hospital · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USHarvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Bio-MicroElectroMechanical Systems Resource CenterP41EB002503 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TONER, MEHMET · 2004 to 2018
$17.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-based microfluidic devices have attracted interest for a wide range of applications. While optical cell counting and flow cytometry-type devices have been reported extensively, sensitive and efficient non-optical methods to detect and quantify cells attached over large surface areas within microdevices are generally lacking. We describe an electrical method for counting cells based on the measurement of changes in conductivity of the surrounding medium due to ions released from surface-immobilized cells within a microfluidic channel. Immobilized cells are lysed using a low conductivity, hypotonic media and the resulting change in impedance is measured using surface patterned electrodes to detect and quantify the number of cells. We found that the bulk solution conductance increases linearly with the number of isolated cells contributing to solution ion concentration. The method of cell lysate impedance spectroscopy is sensitive enough to detect 20 cells microL(-1), and offers a simple and efficient method for detecting and enumerating cells within microfluidic devices for many applications including measurement of CD4 cell counts in HIV patients in resource-limited settings. To our knowledge, this is the most sensitive approach using non-optical setups to enumerate immobilized cells. The microfluidic device, capable of isolating specific cell types from a complex bio-fluidic and quantifying cell number, can serve as a single use cartridge for a hand-held instrument to provide simple, fast and affordable cell counting in point-of-care settings.

Indexed as

CD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell CountCell ExtractsCell LineElectric ImpedanceEquipment DesignFlow CytometryHumansMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesOptics and PhotonicsSpectrum AnalysisTime FactorsCell Extracts

Identifiers

PMID17538717
PMCPMC4476634
OpenAlexW2114396072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.