Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17537937›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2007

Evaluation of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for rifampin and isoniazid susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains and clinical specimens.

Doris Hillemann, Sabine Rüsch-Gerdes, Elvira Richter

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 345 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The reliability of rifampicin resistance as a proxy for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review of studies from Iran.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Subpopulations in clinical samples ofJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Whole-genome sequencing ofEpidemiology and infection · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Diagnosis and treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.Yeungnam University journal of medicine · 2020
    Article
  20. Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Doris HillemannForschungszentrum Borstel, Nationales Referenzzentrum für Mykobakterien, Parkallee 18, D-23845 Borstel, Germany. dhillemann@fz-borstel.de
Sabine Rüsch-Gerdes
Elvira Richter
Research Center Borstel - Leibniz Lung Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The new GenoType MTBDRplus assay (Hain Lifescience GmbH, Nehren, Germany) was tested with 125 clinical isolates and directly with 72 smear-positive sputum specimens for its ability to detect rifampin (RMP) and isoniazid (INH) resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) strains. In total, 106 RMP(r)/INH(r), 10 RMP(s)/INH(r), and 80 RMP(s)/INH(s) MTBC strains were comparatively analyzed with the new and the old MTBDR assays. Besides the detection of mutations within the 81-bp hot spot region of rpoB and katG codon 315, the GenoType MTBDRplus assay is designed to detect mutations in the regulatory region of inhA. The applicability of the new assay directly to specimens was shown, since 71 of 72 results for smear-positive sputa and all 125 results for clinical isolates were interpretable and no discrepancies compared with the results of real-time PCR or DNA sequencing were obtained. In comparison to conventional drug susceptibility testing, both assays were able to identify RMP resistance correctly in 74 of 75 strains (98.7%) and 30 of 31 specimens (96.8%). The misidentification of RMP resistance was obtained for two strains containing rpoB P533L mutations. Compared to the old MTBDR assay, the new GenoType MTBDRplus assay enhanced the rate of detection of INH resistance from 66 (88.0%) to 69 (92.0%) among the 75 INH-resistant strains and 36 (87.8%) to 37 (90.2%) among the 41 specimens containing INH-resistant strains. Thus, the new GenoType MTBDRplus assay represents a reliable and upgraded tool for the detection of INH and RMP resistance in strains or directly from smear-positive specimens.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsCatalaseDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansIsoniazidMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationMycobacterium tuberculosisOxidoreductasesPolymerase Chain ReactionReagent Kits, DiagnosticRifampinSensitivity and SpecificityAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsCatalaseDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesInhA protein, MycobacteriumIsoniazidkatG protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisOxidoreductasesReagent Kits, DiagnosticRifampinRNA polymerase beta subunit

Identifiers

PMID17537937
PMCPMC1951233
OpenAlexW2153385431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.