ArticleClinical drug investigation2003
Postmarketing surveillance study of the efficacy and tolerability of pioglitazone in insulin-resistant patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in general practice.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated in general practice settings. DESIGN AND
settingThis was a postmarketing surveillance study involving 2537 primary-care physicians throughout Germany. PATIENTS AND
interventionsA total of 8760 patients with type 2 diabetes were treated with pioglitazone 15 or 30mg once daily and followed for 16 weeks.
resultsTreatment with pioglitazone 15 or 30mg once daily was associated with a reduction in both fasting plasma glucose (mean 50.1 mg/dL) and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) [mean 1.4%] compared with baseline. The proportion of patients with 'normal' fasting glucose levels (70-110 mg/dL) increased from 2.3% at baseline to 24.2% at the final evaluation. Pioglitazone therapy was associated with a reduction in levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, and an increase in levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol. The proportion of patients at high risk of developing vascular complications decreased progressively during pioglitazone therapy according to a number of parameters.
conclusionsPioglitazone was well tolerated and effective in improving glycaemic control and lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes. Pioglitazone may be effective in reducing the risk of vascular complications of diabetes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.