Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17536174›Full record

ReviewJournal of biosciences2007

Thermosensors in eubacteria: role and evolution.

Wolfgang Schumann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biosciences, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Microbial thermosensors.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2009
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wolfgang SchumannInstitute of Genetics, University of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany. wschumann@uni-bayreuth.de
University of Bayreuth · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temperature is an important physical stress factor sensed by bacteria and used to regulate gene expression. Three different macromolecules have been identified being able to sense temperature: DNA, mRNA and proteins. Depending on the induction mechanism, two different pathways have to be distinguished, namely the heat shock response and the high temperature response. While the heat shock response is induced by temperature increments and is transient, the high temperature response needs a specific temperature to become induced and proceeds as long as cells are exposed to that temperature. The heat shock response is induced by denatured proteins and aimed to prevent formation of protein aggregates by refolding or degradation, and the high temperature response is mainly used by pathogenic bacteria to detect entry into a mammalian host followed by induction of their virulence genes. All known high temperature sensors are present in two alternative conformations depending on the temperature. Heat shock sensors are either molecular chaperones or proteases which keep either a positive transcriptional regulator inactive or a negative regulator active or do not attack the regulator, respectively, under physiological conditions. Denatured proteins either titrate the molecular chaperones or activate the protease. The evolution of the different temperature sensors is discussed.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionHot TemperatureAdaptation, PhysiologicalBacteriaBody Temperature Regulation

Identifiers

PMID17536174
OpenAlexW2049187119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.