ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2007
Identifying pattern-defined regulatory islands in mammalian genomes.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- miR-206 enforces a slow muscle phenotype.Journal of cell science · 2020Article
- A genome-wide assessment of conserved SNP alleles reveals a panel of regulatory SNPs relevant to the peripheral nerve.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Smad2 and PEA3 cooperatively regulate transcription of response gene to complement 32 in TGF-β-induced smooth muscle cell differentiation of neural crest cells.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2011Article
- Uncoupling of expression of an intronic microRNA and its myosin host gene by exon skipping.Molecular and cellular biology · 2010Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying cis-regulatory regions in mammalian genomes is a key challenge toward understanding transcriptional regulation. However, identification and functional characterization of those regulatory elements governing differential gene expression has been hampered by the limited understanding of their organization and locations in genomes. We hypothesized that genes that are conserved across species will also display conservation at the level of their transcriptional regulation and that this will be reflected in the organization of cis-elements mediating this regulation. Using a computational approach, clusters of transcription factor binding sites that are absolutely conserved in order and in spacing across human, rat, and mouse genomes were identified. We term these regions pattern-defined regulatory islands (PRIs). We discovered that these sequences are frequently active sites of transcriptional regulation. These PRIs occur in approximately 1.1% of the half-billion base pairs covered in the search and are located mainly in noncoding regions of the genome. We show that the premise of PRIs can be used to identify previously known and novel cis-regulatory regions controlling genes regulated by myogenic differentiation. Thus, PRIs may represent a fundamental property of the architecture of cis-regulatory elements in mammalian genomes, and this feature can be exploited to pinpoint critical transcriptional regulatory elements governing cell type-specific gene expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.