Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17534596›Full record

Trial reportDiabetologia2007

Differential effects of fatness, fitness and physical activity energy expenditure on whole-body, liver and fat insulin sensitivity.

H B Holt, S H Wild, N Wareham, U Ekelund, M Umpleby, F Shojaee-Moradie, R I G Holt, D I Phillips, C D Byrne

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Lean NAFLD: an underrecognized and challenging disorder in medicine.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Effects of physical activity upon the liver.European journal of applied physiology · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

H B HoltEndocrinology and Metabolism, DOHaD Division,School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
S H Wild
N Wareham
U Ekelund
M Umpleby
F Shojaee-Moradie
R I G Holt
D I Phillips
C D Byrne
International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease · GBMRC Epidemiology Unit · GBUniversity of Surrey · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U106179471Medical Research Council MC_U106179473Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisThe relative contributions of fitness (maximal oxygen uptake), physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) and fatness to whole-body, liver and fat insulin sensitivity is uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine whether fitness and PAEE are associated with whole-body, liver and fat insulin sensitivity independently of body fat. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe recruited 25 men (mean [SD] age 53 [6] years). Whole-body (M value) and liver (percentage suppression of endogenous glucose output) insulin sensitivity were estimated using a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp. Insulin sensitivity in fat (insulin sensitivity index for NEFA) was estimated during an OGTT. Total and truncal fat were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, fitness by treadmill, and PAEE (n = 21) by 3 day heart rate monitoring and Baecke questionnaire.

resultsIn univariate analyses, fatness was strongly associated with insulin sensitivity (whole-body, liver and fat). Fitness was associated with whole-body (r = 0.53, p < 0.007) and liver (0.42, p = 0.04) insulin sensitivity, while PAEE was associated with liver insulin sensitivity (r = 0.55, p = 0.01). Regression models were established to describe associations between fatness, fitness and physical activity and measures of insulin sensitivity (whole-body, fat and liver) as outcomes. Only fatness was independently associated with whole-body insulin sensitivity (B coefficient -0.01, p = 0.001). Fitness was not associated with any outcome. Only PAEE was independently associated with liver insulin sensitivity (B coefficient 13.5, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationFatness explains most of the variance in whole-body insulin sensitivity. In contrast, PAEE explains most of the variance in liver insulin sensitivity.

Indexed as

Insulin ResistanceAdipose TissueAdultAnalysis of VarianceBody CompositionBody Mass IndexEnergy MetabolismExerciseHumansLiverMaleMiddle AgedObesityPhysical FitnessRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID17534596
OpenAlexW2130901353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.