ArticleThe Canadian journal of cardiology2007
Antihypertensive medication use by recently diagnosed hypertensive Canadians.
Article in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Blood Pressure Control in Canada: Through the Looking-Glass Into a Glass Half Empty?American journal of hypertension · 2017Article
- Characteristics Associated With Antihypertensive Treatment and Blood Pressure Control: A Population-Based Follow-Up Study in Peru.Global heart · 2016Article
- Comparison of the Effect of Thiazide Diuretics and Other Antihypertensive Drugs on Central Blood Pressure: Cross-Sectional Analysis Among Nondiabetic Patients.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2015Article
- The risk of falls on initiation of antihypertensive drugs in the elderly.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2013Article
- Do recommendations for the management of hypertension improve cardiovascular outcome? The canadian experience.International journal of hypertension · 2011Article
- Management of hypertension: Regional variations in a greatly improved landscape.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2010Article
- The 2008 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations: the scientific summary -- an annual update.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2008Review
- 2006 Ontario Survey on the Prevalence and Control of Hypertension (ON-BP): rationale and design of a community-based cross-sectional survey.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2008Article
- Characteristics of hypertensive Canadians not receiving drug therapy.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2008Article
- Canadian Hypertension Education Program: the evolution of hypertension management guidelines in Canada.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP) was initiated in 1999 to improve hypertension management in Canada. The objective of the present study was to compare antihypertensive pharmacotherapy in Canada before and after the CHEP.
methodsData were obtained from the longitudinal National Population Health Surveys, which consisted of five cycles at two-year intervals from 1994 to 2002. Recent hypertensive respondents 20 years of age and older were identified the first time hypertension was reported or treated, and were included in a study population of 1453 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. Persistence with medication use was assessed in the cycle after the first report of hypertension.
resultsAntihypertensive medication use within two years of hypertension diagnosis increased with age, from 35% in patients 20 to 39 years of age, to 72.1% in those 80 years of age and older. Antihypertensive medication use increased after the CHEP (from 49.2% to 53.8% of the population), as did the use of multiple antihypertensive medications (from 7.5% to 10.6%). The most commonly used antihypertensive medication for men was angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (beta-blockers were second), but the most common medication for women was diuretics. The overall persistence rate for antihypertensive medication use was 73.2% over two years, which had increased after the CHEP (from 70.4% to 75.4%).
conclusionsThe implementation of the CHEP was followed by increased antihypertensive medication use, increased use of multiple antihypertensive medications and improved persistence with medication use. Although causality cannot be established with the design of the present study, improved hypertension management in Canada is heartening. Sex-related differences were observed in prescribed medications, even though clinical guidelines do not differentiate between sexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.